The twisted hypocritical irony of the culture of death in the United States has a painful grip on a very ill society.
For forty years we have systematically executed nearly sixty million of our own, the most innocent amongst us. While committing our own genocide, we have hypocritically cast judgment on Germans who did nothing during the Holocaust. Genocide is genocide.
Really, how big of a pile would sixty million dead babies make?
Today we live in a country where the Czar is judge, jury, and executor of countless innocent with drones. The same guy then has the nerve to lecture me about violence? Serious Hypocrisy!
The twisted irony is that those who have championed the Slaughter of the Innocent for forty years are now using a mass shooting of innocent to rationalize taking guns away from the walking innocent who simply want to protect themselves from the evil caused by these same folks. Now that’s some crazy shit.
How can anyone really believe these people? Seems to me there is an all out frontal attack on the innocent.
We have an inherent right to defend ourselves. We also have an inherent responsibility to protect life. The propping up of a Declaration of Independence and Constitution that are rooted in Natural Law must be the greatest hypocrisy of all!
The culture of death is diametrically opposed to Natural Law and the “right to Life, Liberty, and pursuit of happiness”.
Some will argue, albeit weakly, that woman has a right to do what she wants. Remember this. Freedom doesn’t give one the right to do whatever one wants. Freedom allows one to do what is right and in accordance with Natural Law.
Wake the Hell up America!
Hmmm, to have a society with no young, no old, no handicapped or feeble, but a nearly perfect aged and healthy society…Reminds me of something…Quite possibly Germany cira 1930′s and 1940′s….The argument of “it’s my body” is so loosely argued it’s absurd and the twisted logic makes ones head spin…I had once asked a co-worker, who was visibly upset about the Casey Anthony case why they were upset..Of course because a young child was murdered, without trying to be vile I stated that, well, she was only two or three so her death really didn’t impact society as she had not contributed to it…I said this only to make a point to this person that they, as a self-proclaimed “liberal”, who cares more about people than those eveeel Rethuglicans and consrvatives was making the judgement of who was/was not more worthy of life…Who’s to say that child who was dismissed and aborted wouldn’t have been the one to possibly cure cancer one day, or be a great leader….They just couldn’t grasp my point and was it lost on them for some time…It may be a very different story if we could put the unborn on the endangered species list…
Interesting. Timely stuff.
It strikes me that those directly involved in “culling the herd” by controlling birth and death are parked safely in the middle. I wonder how their opinions might change in another twenty years – when they’re looking forward to what should be the natural end of their days?
They escaped the abortion forceps, but once their “productive years” are over, how will they deal with death panels and euthanasia?
Will we ultimately legislate death of the aged? Some certainly will support that idea. Until they approach that age, of course.
A good read, Waylon. Thanks for your contribution.