Adam Schiff Exposed After Bizarre Accusation Re Abuse Memo

12
Share

A startling accusation was made last night by Adam Schiff about Devin Nunes, chair of the House Intel Committee. He claimed that Nunes gave Trump a “secretly altered version” of the FISA abuse memo. Only it’s not true. The media should follow up exposing him in thundering headlines throughout the country.

They undoubtedly won’t.

The Schiff allegation went viral when the minority leader telegraphed his dramatic message on Twitter.

THE SCHIFF LIE

“BREAKING: Discovered late tonight that Chairman Nunes made material changes to the memo he sent to White House – changes not approved by the Committee,” he said in the social media missive.

“White House therefore reviewing a document the Committee has not approved for release,” he stated deceptively.

The “Committee Minority discovered” that the “classified memorandum” sent to the White House”, he alleged, ” is not, in fact, the same document that members of the House of Representatives have been reviewing since January 18, 2018,”

They were “never apprised” and “material changes” were made without approval, he said, raising the level of the accusation.

Then he made his demand. “It is now imperative that the Committee Majority immediately withdraw the document that it sent to the White House.”

The media jumped all over it.

Media treats almost every claim by the left as fact without any fact-checking. In one fake news story of the 30th, The Daily Beast claimed Devin Nunes wrote the abuse memo in conjunction with the White House. Not only did they believe their sources, they themselves added to the lie with one of their own. They said Nunes never denied it. In fact, he not only denied it, it’s reflected in their own transcript.

It’s likely the Beast’s source was Adam Schiff who is behind most leaks and false stories without ever being held accountable by the media.

HE COMES UNDONE

Within hours of Schiff’s latest false claim, Devin Nunes explained what those changes were. It is evident from what he said that the changes were not only minor — with some requested by the Minority itself — they were of no material significance. A House Intel spokesperson said the total changes to memo were:

A) Unknown number of ‘grammatical and clarifying’ fixes.

B) One change requested by FBI due to sources and methods concerns.

C) One two-word change requested by Democrats for accuracy.

The House Intel GOP statement: “In its increasingly strange attempt to thwart publication of the memo, the Committee Minority is now complaining about minor edits to the memo, including grammatical fixes and two edits requested by the FBI and by the Minority themselves. The vote to release the memo was absolutely procedurally sound and in accordance with House and Committee rules. To suggest otherwise is a bizarre distraction from the abuses detailed in the memo, which the public will hopefully soon be able to read for themselves.”

It’s not “strange”, it’s willful deceit intended to color the narrative in their favor and damage its credibility in advance of publication.

Adam Schiff is a liar, manipulator, and a minion of the far-left.

Share

12 COMMENTS

  1. The Democrats want to insure that “Russia” remains in the spotlight in order to distract the public and prevent any “pro” Trump message gaining traction. They fully realize, along with the Leftist media, that such a message would inevitably translate into even more support. For the same reasons the Mueller investigation cannot be allowed to falter. It allows the “leak machine” to continue, which then creates more stories to negatively impact any possible support. The question that needs asked is, Why are Republicans complicit in this.

    The More Serious question should be directed to the Intelligence Community, FBI and DOJ. WHY was the decision to seek a “warrant”, against a current political campaign, rather than “Informing” that campaign of efforts by Russians to “interfere in the election”. Shouldn’t protection of US persons be of Primary concern. Why are Republicans complicit in this, by Not asking These questions.

    This Nunes Memo IS the beginning of Republicans “asking” the “important” questions and should Not end there. Serious investigation is warranted given the ineptitude by certain leaders in Government, namely Wray and Clapper. Wray had admitted in a hearing that Congress didn’t have the “authority” for “certain information”. He had to be “instruction” on, basically, the Constitution. Clapper was even MORE ignorant of the Constitution. In his interview on CNN he made the ridiculous assertion that Trump was, get this, in violation of the “Separation of Powers” regarding him and the DOJ / FBI. Evidently he is SO utterly ignorant that he assumes the word “Justice” in DOJ must mean “Judicial Branch”. And HE was the leader in charge of “Intelligence”. He is the epitome of oxymoron.

  2. According to a White House spokesman, whose name CNN cannot pronounce, it sounds as if the White House “may” just run out the clock on the release of the Memo. A review is under way with White House counsel, Intelligence, Law Enforcement and whoever else. Given a Five Day time frame it would appear that time may expire before all the reviews are done.

  3. Adam Schiff is a typical liberal liar. Liberals thrive on lies, fake news and useful idiots. Liberals (in the words of Hillary Clinton) are undermining our democracy in not accepting the results of the 2016 Presidential election.

    Liberalism is a mental derangement of the highest order….it cannot be cured.

  4. They can’t handle the Truth…….FISA Fireworks: Pelosi Demands “Removal” Of Nunes From Intel Committee Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi has written a sternly-worded letter to Speaker Ryan demanding Nunes be removed from his position as Chair of the House Intelligence Committee…….Minutes after Pelosi’s tantrum, Bloomberg reports that The White House plans to sign off on the memo’s release today and send it back to Congress. The release is likely to come Friday morning, Fox News is told……….HHHAAA they are Schiffting there britches!!!!!!!!

  5. Release the memo and hold back the supporting evidence, so that the Democrats can make counter claims, then release the supporting evidence to disprove their claims. Just release enough evidence each time to dispute any explanation they present and eventually, even the slowest minds will see through their lies.

  6. It wouldn’t surprise me. A comment on Twitter mentioned the chance of someone filing an injunction on the release of the memo and the Ninth Circuit would probably uphold it. In one sense I would almost like to see it.

  7. If this report is accurate then Wray should be IMMEDIATELY FIRED. He is asking for ALL names to be redacted in the Nunes Memo. He is engaging in a massive coverup. He has lost ALL credibility.

  8. MORE FROM SHARYL ATTKISSON via the Hill……..In a new exchange released by the Senate Homeland Security committee today, FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok seem to discuss this very issue in private texts.

    Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so

    Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?

    Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule. His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . . I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.

    It’s a shockingly cavalier attitude from an attorney and high level FBI official.

  9. What the Hell would the Democrats, and I suppose the media, do if it came to be that Mueller was clueless, as he was with IRS / Lerner, about what the IG is uncovering. We still haven’t heard any resolution about the GSA’s turning over unresponsive emails etc, from the Transition. And Then we have the mutual agreement to postpone the sentencing of Flynn by both parties.

    The catalyst may well be the “structure” of the Special Counsel Order. It is wide-reaching in its scope and can include ANYTHING THAT MAY ARISE in the investigation. It Would allow Mueller to go after officials in the Government as well as Democrat conspirators. Can anyone imagine all the hysteria that has enveloped everyone in media, politicians and pundits worrying about restricting Mueller only to find out Mueller could be going after their “own”. Remember, Mueller is above reproach and No One can interfere with his “work”. It may have worked with Comey when everyone wanted him fired Until Trump did it. Trying to sell that twice would not pass, primarily because they all have created a wall between the two.

Leave a Reply to Louis Bertrand Cancel reply