Al Gore Is Wrong Again



The global warming conference taking place in Paris beginning November 30th is to get “rich” well-developed countries, mainly the U.S., to agree to dole out money as reparations to countries who are underdeveloped because we are supposedly responsible for the global warming, which, by the way, according to satellite data, the most reliable data, hasn’t taken place for 21 years.

It’s called climate debt. It’s the debt we allegedly owe the world for our success and affluence though the science of global warming has been proven wrong and greatly exaggerated since its inception.

Five years ago, the Goracle claimed there s a 75% chance – during some of the summer months- the Arctic Sea could be completely ice-free by this time.

Today the Arctic sea ice is so extensive, regular shipping can’t pass through.

The Antarctic Sea Ice Shelf reached a new maximum – it’s growing. We were supposed to have a ‘fever’ by now.

For years the Hockey Stick Theory provided proof that the earth has been getting warmer since the Medieval Ages. That was fully debunked but not having records to prove global warming didn’t even slow down the climate change movement.

All the global warming scientists have as so-called proof are computer generated models predicting future catastrophes which have been proven wrong time and again.

One of the co-founders of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, PhD., who helped start this movement in the 1970s said we are in an Ice Age now.

He left Greenpeace and spoke before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight in February of last year.

He stated unequivocally that “There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years.”

“If there were such a proof, it would be written down for all to see. No actual proof, as it is understood in science, exists.

Moore zeroed in on the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and strongly scolded it for claiming there is a “95-100% probability” that man “has been the dominant cause of” global warming. Those numbers, he said, have been invented.

He characterized the IPCC’s reliance on computer models as futile; told senators that history “fundamentally contradicts the certainty that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming”; and noted that “during the Greenhouse Ages,” a period that precedes our fossil-fuel burning civilization, “there was no ice on either pole and all the land was tropical and subtropical from pole to pole.”

Moore insisted “that a warmer temperature than today’s would be far better than a cooler one” and reminded lawmakers “that we are not capable, with our limited knowledge, of predicting which way” temperatures “will go next.”

“CO2 is the most important nutrient on earth,” Mr. Moore says in the film, “please teach the children this.”

Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, sees the seduction of the Pope to the cause of redistributive climate change as a massive coup.



Schellnhuber, pictured above, was one of only three papal presenters at a recent papal conference. He is a radical who wrote books that insist governments must not allow temperatures to rise more than 2 degrees higher than the start of the industrial revolution.

Of global warming, and as a proponent of population control, he has said, “In a very cynical way, it’s a triumph for science because at last we have stabilized something –- namely the estimates for the carrying capacity of the planet, namely below 1 billion people.”

He has called for an “Earth Constitution” to transcend even the “U.N. Charter.” Along with that there would be a “Global Council” of elite elected by “all the people on Earth.” There would be a “Planetary Court” which would be “transnational” with appeals accepted from everyone, especially if there are violations of the Earth Constitution.

One can easily imagine what this would do to our U.S. Constitution and our sovereignty.

Schellnhuber advised Pope Francis and much of the encyclical reflects Schellnhuber’s views – it’s the same hyperbole but without terms like “Earth Constitution” and “Planetary Court” though the concepts are clearly there.

Barack Obama has already indicated that he will force a U.N. climate change treaty on the American public by circumventing Congress.

In August 2014, the New York Times announced Obama was pursuing a sweeping climate agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress, even though it was an accord in name only. This type of agreement is a treaty of course.

The process will include shaming the U.S. Several nations have agreed to cooperate with the U.S. in circumventing Congress.

The Times reported that the proposal will use legally binding conditions from the 1992 treaty with new voluntary pledges. It will “update” the treaty and not require a “new vote of ratification”.

The entire movement will lead to global governance by Socialists with the forced implementation of the most massive redistribution scheme in history.


  1. Whenever a pseudo-scientist starts proclaiming, “the science is settled” I like to introduce them to my good friend, Mr. Piltdown Man.

Comments are closed.