Congressmen in a Few Words Destroy Lies Out of the Swamp About Abuse Memo


Two congressmen, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY), have singlehandedly destroyed the disinformation campaign by the media and some politicians. They did it with few words and in tweets.


The release of the memo has been characterized as a national security threat although there is no classified information in the document as anyone can see.

Adam Schiff is the biggest promulgator of lies.


The FBI and DoJ damaged their own images.

The big takeaway from the House Intel memo is that the FISA court, FISC, was misled, not once, not twice, but four times. For media and politicians to say it’s a violation of national security to reveal corruption in FBI/DoJ process is a dangerous attitude to have. Of course Americans should know about unverified opposition research backed by circular reporting.

The FBI had an opportunity to remove anything inaccurate before the memo was released and found no inaccuracies. They are free to add anything they believe was left out.

Two congressman were able to destroy arguments against release of the memo with tweets.


Reporters began to spread the lie that McCabe never testified the dossier was the determining factor in obtaining the warrant and without it, no warrant would have been granted. They hope to cast doubt on the extent of the use of the dossier/Clinton opposition research, but it was quickly snuffed out by Rep. Zeldin who explained that the McCabe testimony was taped.

CNN tried to make that dishonest argument.

CNN is citing two anonymous democrat sources saying that McCabe did not say this. Here is a congressman confirming it on the record. Way to go, .


The left picked up on a line that mentioned George Papadopoulos’s drunken boasts in a barroom with an equally-drunk Australian Ambassador to the U.S. However, that did not become known until months later and it changes nothing about the McCabe testimony.


Another lie spread by our media has hopefully been extinguished although it keeps rearing its ugly head. They are trying to tie the Republicans to the dossier because the conservative publication Free Beacon hired Fusion GPS to do research on Donald Trump. That had nothing to do with the dossier. the only connection was Rusion GPS was hired to do both. Media want the public to believe that Republicans began the dossier and Democrats finished it. They’re trying to lend it credibility with lies.

In summary, what Free Beacon did has NOTHING to do with the dossier. The only common denominator was the company.

Daily Caller reporter Amber Athey called them out.

As far as the release of the memo, Democrats are trying to draw a wedge between the FBI and DoJ and Republicans. One poll said 40% of Republicans don’t trust the FBI and DoJ. The poll results reflect the way the questions are asked. Republicans still admire, support and respect the agents who keep us safe and Democrats still by-and-large dislike law enforcement. Republicans can separate them from some corrupt officials at the top.


  1. Let’s not forget that the Steele dossier was written in stages. So, it could be that each section was used as “new information” given to FISA court. It’s rather progressive in its accusations.

    There should be a Much Greater emphasis on the extent of the Page surveillance. Was it ONLY him, or were others in the campaign directly monitored, and, if so, to what extent was that monitoring.

    Much is being made, by Democrats, that Page was on the radar going back to 2013. If THIS was such a huge concern Why wasn’t Trump informed of this, at least secretly.

    Once again, Brennan, supporter of Muslim Brotherhood, says the Dossier played No role in their assessment. So, are we to believe the countless similarities are by coincidence. I believe there were reports that they Steele, in fact, spoke With them. Maybe it wasn’t the Actual Document he means here but “conversations” with the “author”. We certainly know that a “parsing” of words is necessary with these people.

    This statement: “Just because it was unverified doesn’t mean it wasn’t true.”, is ridiculous. According to Evelyn Farkas our Agencies have “excellent” intelligence on Russia. So WHY is it NOT verified. Steele was an Intelligent Agent and had “sources”. Are we to believe that OUR Agents cannot do what Steele so easily accomplished, over Many Months?? What does This say about Brennan and His Agency.

    Steele left Moscow in 1993 and because his name had been on a list of MI6 officers leaked and published in 1999, he was unable to return to Moscow. Steele delivered a total of 16 reports to Fusion between June and early November 2016, but his sources started to go quiet beginning in July, when Trump’s ties to Russia came under scrutiny.

    Steele flew to Rome in June to brief his FBI contact and returned in September to meet a full FBI team of investigators , and they asked him to explain his methods and to pass on future reports.

    It should Now be noted that reading those reports there are significant contradictions within it. Was Steele incapable of noting these blatant contradictions in those details.

    Christopher Steele, the former British spy who fueled an ongoing investigation into President Trump’s administration, was a lot more confident of his charges when he wrote his now-notorious 2016 dossier than he is today in defending it in a libel lawsuit.

    While Mr. Steele stated matter-of-factly in his dossier that collusion between Mr. Trump and the Russian government took place, he called it only “possible” months later in court filings. While he confidently referred to “trusted” sources inside the Kremlin, in court he referred to the dossier’s “limited intelligence.” In one answer, Mr. Steele refers to the intelligence he gathered as “limited.” On the charge of collusion by Mr. Trump and his campaign advisers, he now says there was only “possible coordination.”

    It has been reported that Steele, somehow, somewhere, received the second Dossier by Cody Shearer and use that as supporting evidence. It is likely this, too, was used in the warrant application.

    There was certainly Some coordination by Democrats and Trump / Russia. Minority leader Reid wrote to Comey.
    “In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government…The public has a right to know this information.”

    This is all just Some of the “public record” that was Already reported on regularly. Maybe there should be written a “Dossier” on the web that has entangled all these players going back to 2015.

  2. The FISA ‘warrant’ request, against Carter Page, was made October 21st, 2016, under Title I of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Meaning the surveillance application was specifically stating, to the court, the U.S. individual was likely an actual agent of a foreign government, ie. “a spy.”…………………Because of this direct approach, any group, organization or entity who came in contact with U.S. Person Carter Page was then open for ancillary review and FBI investigation. Those who engaged in contact with Carter Page became subject to surveillance and searches in the same manner as if Page was an actual foreign agent……….this is the tactic the FBI/DOJ used to WIRETAP Trump and company, ………………..In the HPSCI outline it specifically notes the targeting of U.S. individual Carter Page was NOT a FISA Title VII search request. Title VII is FISA(702), the incidental collection of U.S. person information as it relates to National Security or Counterintelligence operations targeting foreign individuals………….under Title I of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, The FBI can spy on anyone you talk to, text, e-mail, have a beer with!!!!! Page was with the Trump Campaign for about 20 minutes(sarc) the FBI used 2013 concerns about him to get a Title I Surveillance….Bingo Trump can be spied on too!!!!!!!!!!

  3. I distinctly recall Hillary Clinton, also, insisting that the dossier was originally paid for by Republican. Why does she get a pass on perpetuating false claims?

Comments are closed.