If you want to know where the leadership in the Democratic Party is coming from, you only need to look at this tweet from Donna Brazile, the newly-fired analyst for CNN, who cheated and then lied about it. It’s not about cheating and lying for her, that is a no-never-mind, only the end result matters.
She is some role model and she will be as the DNC head. No one fired her from that.
This is reminiscent of Harry Reid’s lies about Mitt Romney.
Reid (D-Nev.) during the 2012 election, said an anonymous source told him Mitt Romney didn’t pay taxes for ten years. He hurt Romney’s candidacy and after the election, when he was confronted with the lie he said, “He didn’t win, did he?”
That’s also what the Clinton operatives said in the Project Veritas videos. Scott Foval said he doesn’t care “what the friggin legal and ethics people say, we need to win this mother f****r.”
The fact that these people don’t even know they are cheaters, liars and trouble makers or don’t care that they are should alarm people
This is also very Alinsky, the idol of the Obamas and the Clintons. Alinsky once said, “Only two kinds of people can afford the luxury of acting on principle, those with absolute power and those with none and no desire to get any…everyone else who wants to be effective in politics has to learn to be ‘unprincipled’ enough to compromise in order to see their principles succeed.” (Rogers 1990: 12)
Of Means and Ends according to Alinsky in his Rules for Radicals:
“The end is what you want, the means is how you get it. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. … The real arena is corrupt and bloody.” p.24
“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…. The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means… The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be….” pp.25-26
“The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means….” p.29
“The seventh rule… is that generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics….” p.34
“The tenth rule… is you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments…. It involves sifting the multiple factors which combine in creating the circumstances at any given time… Who, and how many will support the action?… If weapons are needed, then are appropriate d weapons available? Availability of means determines whether you will be underground or above ground; whether you will move quickly or slowly…” p.36
She will keep on cheating and lying.
She is also playing the martyr. This is morally sick stuff.
Correction: In our original article, we stated that host Don Lemon gave the answers to Donna Brazile but cannot verify that and apologize for the error.