The Future Of bin-Ladenism

0
Share

Al Quaeda Modesty Police

After 9/11 and the U.S. wars in the Middle East, bin-laden had a huge surge in popularity. Up until 2008, interest in bin-Laden’s ideology waned (Pew research poll indicates it went from 74% to 29%). One can assume the carnage from collateral damage added to this decreased interest in bin-Ladenism. Unfortunately, since 2008, it is back on the rise. Will the young reject extremism? Egypt might be giving us our first warning.

Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Sticks with bin Laden
“Most of yesterday’s headlines proclaiming the death of Osama bin Laden used epithets like “terror mastermind” or “bastard” to refer to the internationally feared mass murderer. (That latter headline is from the New York Post.) But in its first public statement on the killing of bin Laden, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood used the honorific term “sheikh” to refer to the al-Qaeda leader. It also accused Western governments of linking Islam and terrorism, and defended “resistance” against the U.S. presence in Iraq and Afghanistan as “legitimate.”

The Muslim Brotherhood’s response to bin Laden’s death may finally end the mythology — espoused frequently in the U.S. — that the organization is moderate or, at the very least, could moderate once in power. This is, after all, precisely how Muslim Brothers describe their creed — “moderate,” as opposed to al-Qaeda, which is radical. “Moderate Islam means not using violence, denouncing terrorism, and not working with jihadists,” said Muslim Brotherhood youth activist Khaled Hamza, for whom the organization’s embrace of “moderate Islam” was the primary reason he joined.

Yet the Muslim Brotherhood’s promise that its “moderation” means rejecting violence includes a gaping exception: the organization endorses violence against military occupations, which its leaders have told me include Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Bosnia, and Palestine — in other words, nearly every major conflict on the Eurasian continent…” The Atlantic

Share