English Pravda Thinks US Voters Are Illiterate and Obama Is a Commie



English Pravda thinks our voters are illiterate and Obama is a communist. At least that is what English Pravda thinks.

On July 6, 2009, Obama told Putin he did an excellent job as prime minister. It was the beginning of the reset in our relationships. The reset never happened. The Russians have been our enemy at every turn. Putin appears to regard Obama with disdain, shunning him and working against him in countries like Syria.

On November 19, 2012, Pravda.ru. called the US electorate illiterate:

Recently, Obama has been re-elected for a 2nd term by an illiterate society and he is ready to continue his lies of less taxes while he raises them. He gives speeches of peace and love in the world while he promotes wars as he did in Egypt, Libya and Syria. He plans his next war is with Iran as he fires or demotes his generals who get in the way.

The author of the Pravda article then goes on to say:

Well, any normal individual understands that as true but liberalism is a psychosis . O’bomber even keeps the war going along the Mexican border with projects like “fast and furious” and there is still no sign of ending it.  He is a Communist without question promoting the Communist Manifesto without calling it so. How shrewd he is in America. His cult of personality mesmerizes those who cannot go beyond their ignorance. They will continue to follow him like those fools who still praise Lenin and Stalin in Russia.  Obama’s fools and Stalin’s fools share the same drink of illusion.

What I find interesting about this is that they call Obama a communist while Putin is moving towards free market. Putin is no conservative of course and keep in mind that the Russians are masters of propaganda:

Reading Putin’s speech without knowing the author, one would think it was written by Reagan or another conservative in America. The speech promotes smaller government and less taxes. It comes as no surprise to those who know Putin as a conservative. Vladimir Putin went on to say:

“…we are reducing taxes on production, investing money in the economy. We are optimizing state expenses.

 The second possible mistake would be excessive interference into the economic life of the country and the absolute faith into the all-mightiness of the state.

There are no grounds to suggest that by putting the responsibility over to the state, one can achieve better results.

Unreasonable expansion of the budget deficit, accumulation of the national debt – are as destructive as an adventurous stock market game.

During the time of the Soviet Union the role of the state in economy was made absolute, which eventually lead to the total non-competitiveness of the economy. That lesson cost us very dearly. I am sure no one would want history to repeat itself.”

President Vladimir Putin could never have imagined anyone so ignorant or so willing to destroy their people like Obama much less seeing millions vote for someone like Obama. They read history in America don’t they? Alas, the schools in the U.S. were conquered by the Communists long ago and history was revised thus paving the way for their Communist presidents. Obama has bailed out those businesses that voted for him and increased the debt to over 16 trillion with an ever increasing unemployment rate especially among blacks and other minorities. All the while promoting his agenda.

“We must seek support in the moral values that have ensured the progress of our civilization. Honesty and hard work, responsibility and faith in our strength are bound to bring us success.”- Vladimir Putin [English Pravda]

English Pravda is not the same as the Russian Pravda. It’s not the government media but it is not democratic.

Obama does make me nervous. He seems to have some secret thing going on missile defense with Putin – in his own words:

One thing is for sure, Europe has been trying to move away from the failed socialist model, save France, while we speed towards it. I can’t answer for Russia and I certainly don’t trust them, and they use conspiracy theories to further their propaganda, but, like I say, this article is an interesting read if you sift through the propaganda.