“Explosive” “Secret” Report by “Anonymous” Sources with “No Specific Intelligence” Says Russia’s Guilty

1
Share

Fake news disseminators, The Washington Post and The New York Times reported on Friday night that Obama’s politicized CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system.

Allegedly, intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, according to anonymous U.S. officials. Those officials described the individuals as actors known to the intelligence community and part of a wider Russian operation to boost Trump and hurt Clinton’s chances.

CNN and the media in general are appalled by the Trump transition team response: “The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history.” the Trump transition team’s statement read. “It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again.'”

Trump also said, these are “the same people who said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”

The Democrats have been trying to cover up the Wikileaks emails since they were published and they have continually blamed the Russians in an effort to kill Trump’s election chances. In addition, every government agency has been politicized as well as the media. So, we ask you, why should we believe any of this without seeing the “secret” CIA report?

In an interview with Time published this week, Trump said the previous hacks could have been caused by Russia, or China, or “some guy in his home in New Jersey.”

Lawrence O’Donnell on NBC, a very biased network, interviewed Malcom Nance, a former counterintelligence officer, who is a known liar as The Intercept revealed. Even after Nance found out he was pushing a false narrative about a fake Wikileaks email published by a Clinton fan, he continued to further the story and not correct the record.

O’Donnell also interviewed David Corn an analyst who is employed by George Soros’s Mother Jones as a bureau chief, who was appalled at Trump’s reaction and who backed up the story as if something had been proven by it.

This is going on throughout the MSM.

The media is calling this revelation of a “secret” report leaked by “anonymous” sources tied to Obama as “explosive” but we still don’t have an ounce of proof. There is also “no specific intelligence” showing the Kremlin directed any of this.

This is the worst sort of journalism on the part of The Washington Post, the New York Times and all the parrots condemning Donald Trump for his “shocking reaction”. As Glenn Greenwald wrote,the key claims are based exclusively on the unverified assertions of anonymous officials, who in turn are disseminating their own claims about what the CIA purportedly believes, all based on evidence that remains completely secret.

Anonymous officials with alleged connections to the Russian government provided the Wikileaks emails according to the Post in order to get Trump elected. The New York Times cites a second leak that the Russians hacked the RNC but released the DNC data to get Trump elected.

The Post notes – rather critically – and way down in the article – that “there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.” Most importantly, the Post adds that “intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin ‘directing’ the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks.”

No one is saying the Russians didn’t do it or that it shouldn’t be investigated but there is, so far, no evidence whatsoever. Putin is a dangerous geo-political enemy but we can’t convict him without evidence.

Anyone could have hacked the DNC and Podesta’s emails.

Barack Obama has ordered a review by his politicized agencies.

What is most concerning is the ultimate goal is probably to politicize the electoral college. The left wants to make the electoral college subject to lobbying and campaigning instead of allowing it to remain as a pro forma group.

Proof, we want proof!

Share

1 COMMENT

  1. So what? This is just another lie by sore losers in this country. I can’t wait until January 20th and for Donald Trump to shut down the fake news through Martial law.

Comments are closed.