Wikileaks: Algeria Paid $12 Million for Hillary to Attend a Meeting

0

We have four more fascinating emails for you plus we have Hillary acting tough at the end.

CLINTON DID NOT TAKE ALGERIA OFF THE TERROR WATCH LIST BUT IT WAS LIKELY PAY FOR PLAY

How would you like to pay $12 million for a meeting?

There is a rumor going around the Internet that Algeria made a donation to the Clinton Foundation and were taken off the terror watch list in a quid pro quo but Alergia was never on the terror watch list. The rumor was started by Joe Scarborough on MSNBC and went around again when it was discussed by Team Clinton in an email. Someone tweeted the convo and left the part out in which they say the only problem is Algeria was never on the watch list.

What Algeria did want is Hillary’s attendance at a meeting.

Just after Hillary dodged a debate question on her pay-to-play enterprise, an email was released showing the candidate herself was at the center of obtaining a $12 million commitment from King Mohammed VI of Morocco.

This was a charge made by top gun, Huma Abedin.

In the HRC email 2030, Huma explained Hillary would meet with Moroccan officials once they made their $12 million donation to the Clinton foundation. “This was HRCs idea…she created this mess and she knows it.”

Other nations that donated, like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, got arms deals like they’ve never gotten before.

algeria

Morocco also received arms from the client of the Podesta Group and with the approval of the State Department.

Read about that on this link.

Wikileaks: Algeria Paid $12 Million for Hillary to Attend a Meeting — Possible Arms Deal

 

2.HILLARY DOESN’T GIVE TWO HOOTS ABOUT NATIONAL SECURITY

Hillary talked about the nuclear launch to show how tough she is and she could have cared less if it was inappropriate. She does whatever she wants.

Hillary talked about nuclear launches, she even talked about the length of time it takes to get the nuclear weapon off the ground. The military doesn’t talk about this and she shouldn’t either but we already know she has no regard whatsoever for national security.

CNN’s Barbara Starr investigated. A number of reporters were wondering if this was a national security breach. She found that the military is very unhappy about what she said. When she spoke with the military they said they couldn’t discuss it during a political campaign but they also said “they do not discuss operational timelines for launching nuclear weapons.” When she asked Defense Secretary Ash Carter about it, he refused to answer.

She wanted to find out if what Hillary told the American people during the debate and also tweeted was classified.

Starr said, “But here is the bottom line: the U.S. military does not discuss the precise specifics of the time frames of launching nuclear weapons that, by all accounts, is extremely classified.”

Starr continued. “And if you know information to be classified and you’re a government official, even if it’s in the open source, even if it’s on the internet, you are not supposed to disclose it.”

Starr mentioned how unhappy the military is about Clinton’s comment.

“The bottom line is the U.S. military [is] not especially thrilled to be discussing in precise detail what it takes to launch nuclear weapons,” Starr said.

“With 70 million people watching,” host Brooke Baldwin added, referring to those who watched the debate.

 

3.HILLARY HAS ZERO EVIDENCE THAT INTELLIGENCE SAID RUSSIA IS BEHIND WIKILEAKS

 

4.JANE SANDERS BEGGED BERNIE NOT TO ENDORSE

Jane Sanders begged her husband Bernie to not endorse Hillary Clinton but he did it anyway. After finding out Team Clinton rigged the election, perhaps he wishes he hadn’t.

jane-sanders-begged-bernie-to-not-endorse-hillary

 

BONUS EMAIL: MOCKING BERNIE’S JEWISH ACCENT

These people are so bigoted.