Government Schools That Put IUDs In 6th Graders Without Parental Permission



Some government schools are now implanting IUD’s in children as young as 6th grade without parental permission. There are now 13 Seattle, Washington public high schools and middle schools that will arrange to have taxpayer-funded intrauterine devices (IUDs) implanted without parental consent.

These schools have school-based health clinics where this takes place. They offer long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including IUDs and hormonal implants.

LARCs have some serious side effects such as uterine perforation and infection. IUDs, specifically, can also act as abortifacients by preventing the implantation of a fertilized egg. Not every parent is okay with that but they don’t have a say.

They know best and you have nothing to say about it.

This is a perfect example of the government coming between parent and child in a way that is destructive to the relationship.

Many parents want their children to enjoy their childhood but this type of thing makes it trendy to do at a very young age.

This freebie program from the benevolent government is called Take Charge. It is a Washington State Medicaid program which provides free birth control to adults who are poor and to teens who don’t want parents to know what they’re doing. It’s the government’s way of ending teen pregnancy.

As the CNS News reporter wrote, children can’t get a candy bar or a soda in the schools but they can get IUDs.

Planned Parenthood has been pushing this but it’s the state that decides if parental permission is required. States that don’t require parental permission are: California, Connecticut, D.C., Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington. As with everything, it will creep into every school eventually unless the Supreme Court decides to jump in and make it a constitutional right.

Parents beware.

Life News and CNS News


  1. We don’t want abortion and we don’t want birth control. I’m sure that students would not consider having sex without their parents permission. Your head under a rock much? Almost as bad as saying that administering young girls the HPV, vaccine encourages them to have sex. You can’t make this stuff up – if is wasn’t so hurtful, it would be funny.

    • “if is wasn’t so hurtful, it would be funny.” hurtful to who ralph? the ten year-olds given a green light vis~a~vis the government to have indiscriminate relations without their parents knowledge? the parents; when something goes amiss and then find their eleven year-old ‘with child’ despite the ‘best intentions’ of the school? what about our culture if we acquiesce and find ourselves on a ‘slippery slope’ towards forced sterilization? do you think that’s a ‘stretch’ ralph?
      if you do you should know that we did just that at the turn of the 20th century. margaret sanger ( of ‘planned parenthood’ fame ) spearheaded the cause; the carnegie institution and the rockefeller foundation gave up the dough.
      the popular catch-phrase in polite society at the time was “some people were born to be a burden to others.”

      honest to goodness ralph, you ‘just can’t make this stuff up’…b

    • I cannot believe you are defending this BS! I have an IUD, have for 8 years. I, as an adult, looked into the consequences, the potential risks and the warning signs. I had to have mine replaced because of an issue with it that, if left unchecked, could have permanently scarred or even killed me. You think just any KID should be allowed to do that without parental consent or at the VERY least informing them? What happens if there were a complication? One the girl does not talk about? One she hides because she KNOWS her parents were not informed? This isn’t even pill she can just stop taking, she cannot remove it herself. How in the hell can you think this is a good idea?

  2. If the State can force a medical procedure on anyone without informed consent (and in the case of a minor, this means a parent or legal guardian) then no one is free. This is a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee of “the right of the people to be secure in their persons…” Attempt to subvert the family unit.

  3. Putting an IUD in an 11-year old is not the same thing as a vaccine or handing out condoms. Doing this without a judge involved is outrageous. Giving that kind of power to the government is way too much. Ralph is one of the people who will keep giving away all our freedoms and one day we will wake up and we all really will be living in Detroit or Oceania.

  4. Hmmmm, there was another society in another time with a “take charge” government that took control over the youth. They were brainwashed and turned against their parents. We called them Nazis. We aren’t free people except to bury our noses in all kinds of media devices and argue over flags and marriages and whether or not they are Christmas trees or Holiday bushes while our SCOTUS as well as the POTUS continue to stomp all over our rights until we no longer recognize our country. That day is closer than you think. I don’t know who said this but I believe it: “A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.” Have we let it get big enough yet?

  5. I think it’s a great idea as long as the program is medically monitored to make sure there are no problems as the Adult woman stated that she had to have her IUD removed and replaced. Is the young lady informed she has had an IUD implanted back in the 6th grade when she graduates. What if she drops out of school? At least, she didn’t drop out because she was pregnant. Who is going to monitor the program. A female OB/Gyn MD, because the schools are laying off School Nurses !!

Comments are closed.