Hillary Has a Horrific History as an Abuser of Bill’s Sexual Assault Victims

1
Share

Hillary came out quickly yesterday to condemn Trump’s admittedly disgusting conversation 11 years ago.

She is a holy roller now but how quickly she forgot her husband’s many trips on a plane (The Pedophile Express) with a pedophile to his pedophile Utopia. How easily she has forgotten her threats to Bill Clinton’s sexual assault victims.

A case in point would be the 1998 interview with Matt Lauer on The Today Show in which she blamed the right-wing for the stories – true stories about her husband’s disgusting behavior – and during which she threatened the victims.

This is the dialogue in question.

“This is—the great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president. A few journalists have kind of caught on to it and explained it. But it has not yet been fully revealed to the American public. And actually, you know, in a bizarre sort of way, this may do it.”

[…]

“I think we’re going to find some other things. And I think that when all of this is put into context, and we really look at the people involved here, look at their motivations and look at their backgrounds, look at their past behavior, some folks are going to have a lot to answer for.”

Bill Clinton has never treated women well, and when he was initially running for President, his wife Hillary is reported to have run a “war room” to crack down on so called “bimbo eruptions.” This was the name given to the countless stories of infidelity and sexual assaults committed by Bill Clinton over the years.

She led the research team to collect information on Bill Clinton’s sexual assault victims to destroy their credibility.

The following is well-documented and reported by the New York Times:

“We have to destroy her story,” Mrs. Clinton said in 1991 of Connie Hamzy, one of the first women to come forward during her husband’s first presidential campaign, according to George Stephanopoulos, a former Clinton administration aide who described the events in his memoir, “All Too Human.” (Three people signed sworn affidavits saying Ms. Hamzy’s story was false.)

When Gennifer Flowers later surfaced, saying that she had had a long affair with Mr. Clinton, Mrs. Clinton undertook an “aggressive, explicit direction of the campaign to discredit” Ms. Flowers, according to an exhaustive biography of Mrs. Clinton, “A Woman in Charge,” by Carl Bernstein.

Mrs. Clinton referred to Monica Lewinsky, the White House intern who had an affair with the 42nd president, as a “narcissistic loony toon,” according to one of her closest confidantes, Diane D. Blair, whose diaries were released to the University of Arkansas after her death in 2000.

Ms. Lewinsky later called the comment an example of Mrs. Clinton’s impulse to “blame the woman.”

[…]

Over the years, the Clinton effort to cast doubt on the women included using words like “floozy,” “bimbo” and “stalker,” and raising questions about their motives. James Carville, a longtime strategist for Mr. Clinton, was especially cutting in attacking Ms. Flowers. “If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find,” Mr. Carville said of Ms. Flowers. (Mr. Carville has maintained that earlier reports indicating that he had made the remark about Paula Jones, another Clinton accuser, were incorrect.)

Novelist and feminist Jennifer Weiner said, “Mr. Trump’s attacks make Mrs. Clinton look less like “a strong, self-actualized feminist leader who women can proudly get behind.” They are more “like a craven opportunist, and an apologist for a predator.”

In 2014, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) during an interview on C-Span’s “Newsmakers” said that Democrats need to return funds raised by womanizer Bill Clinton if they really support women as they claim.

“They can’t have it both ways,” Paul said, and so I really think that anybody who wants to take money from Bill Clinton or have a fundraiser has a lot of explaining to do. In fact, I think they should give the money back. If they want to take position on women’s rights, by all means do. But you can’t do it and take it from a guy who was using his position of authority to take advantage of young women in the workplace.”

Asked on Newsmax TV whether Clinton is an unsavory character, Paul called Clinton a “sexual predator.”

“Yeah, I mean, a predator, a sexual predator, basically. Repetitive,” Paul said. “There’s … at least a half a dozen public women who have come forward. Some of them did sue in the (workplace).”

“If they want to be credible in saying they defend women’s rights in the workplace, they really need to disown and really return any contributions that Bill Clinton’s either raising for people or giving to people,” Paul said.

Hillary has no right to call the kettle black. She’s horrific and Bill is especially so.

Hillary hasn’t been very nice to women and she seems to think her predator husband gets a pass but comments made by Trump 11 years ago in a private conversation are “horrific”. She’s horrific.

Share

1 COMMENT

  1. What one says is nowhere near the gravity of what one does. And when it comes to does, Hillary takes the cake.

Comments are closed.