Mullahs Get Behind Barack Obama for President

 

Catherine Herridge, investigative reporter for Fox News, reported on Jeanine Pirro’s show this evening that the Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Mike Rogers, is concerned that intel is being leaked to protect Ambassador Rice. Intel that supports a protest story is being leaked but not other information which would provide opposing scenarios.

Also being reported is that Iran has agreed to meet with the United States for one-on-one negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program. This is coming from Obama administration officials. It is allegedly an effort to avoid war but it sounds more like an Obama effort to win votes. [NY Times]

The Iranians are supposedly insisting on holding up the talks until after the presidential election. That is very convenient because in this way it would provide a ray of hope for the naive and Obama can’t be indicted for its failure.

Another story came out of WND today in which a U.S. spy, who goes under the pseudonym Reza Kahlili, stated that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to a deal negotiated in secret to help Barack Obama win the election. It is in Iran’s interests to defeat Mitt Romney who is an Israeli supporter. The deal would discuss exchanging a cutback in Iran’s nuclear enrichment for a relief in sanctions.

via WND

…Iranian and U.S. negotiators have reached an agreement that calls for Iran to halt part of its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of many of the U.S. sanctions against the Islamic regime, according to a highly placed source.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, expects a letter from President Obama in a few days guaranteeing the details of the agreement, arrived at recently during secret negotiations in Doha, Qatar…Read full story here

Then there is the latest information coming out of US intelligence agencies that there is no evidence that last month’s deadly attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was ordered by Al-Qaeda, The Los Angeles Times reported late Friday.

The  LA Times, citing unnamed officials, are stating that the attack in Benghazi was:

…“carried out following a minimum amount of planning.”

“The attackers exhibited a high degree of disorganization,” the paper quotes one of the intelligence officials as saying.

“Some joined the attack in progress, some did not have weapons and others just seemed interested in looting.”

According to another official cited by the paper, “There isn’t any intelligence that the attackers pre-planned their assault days or weeks in advance.”…Read full story…

That is a completely unbelievable story. Terrorist Abu Khatalli has admitted to being at the consulate during the attack. The attack was obviously well-planned and heavy artillery is not something people walk around with until the next video protest. Militia were spotted by witnesses. There was no evidence of a protest before the attack.

The Monday night debate will not include a question about Benghazi according to some reports thought that remains to be seen. I don’t doubt Mitt Romney will bring it up despite the moderator’s choice of questions. The biased-left moderator, Bob Schieffer, has numerous questions about Iran which will fit into the latest Obama tale of “success” in his dealings with Iran.

What will happen next to ensure that Obama wins re-election? Obama has found the solution to world peace?

Are the American people really going to be impressed with Mullahs wanting Barack Obama re-elected?

There is no question that a strike on Libya is also possible as a vote getter.

The video which was taken from the consulate cameras the night of the attack is damning of the administration according to unnamed FBI sources but the administration will not release the tape to Congress.

 

Share on Google+Print this pageEmail this to someoneShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponShare on Tumblr