Muslim Immigration: Why Extreme Vetting Is Not Enough



Photo by Jamie Kennedy Used under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license

UPDATED January 6, 2018

The devastating results of admitting substantial numbers of Migrants—who are mostly Muslims—into Germany are rarely reported in the United States. But America must take heed, or suffer the same fate.

Germany is a case study of a Western nation admitting a large number of Muslims over a short period. Dr. Mengele couldn’t have thought up a more diabolical experiment. The results in Germany are unequivocal–we’re witnessing the complete destruction of the German culture. They can be extrapolated to America’s admitting a large number, over a (somewhat) longer period.

Terror attacks in Germany have gained an increasingly high profile in the wake of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s folly of welcoming any refugee/migrants to Germany who want to come. Social media spread the word, and a record 1.1 million entered Germany in 2015 alone, capping four years of “multicultural immigration.”

“In addition to the 5.8 million Muslims already living in Germany, wrote Soeren Kern, Gatestone Institute’s Europe expert, “after factoring in family reunifications, Germany’s Muslim population is set to [reach] 20 million within the next five years, according to a demographic forecast by Bavarian lawmakers.”

Twelve people were killed in the truck attack on a Berlin Christmas market, December 19th of 2016. Anis Amri, a Tunisian asylum-seeker was the perpetrator, police say.

That was the worst, in a string of five migrant-related terror attacks that year, including an axe attack on a train and an 18-year-old Iranian-German who “went on a shooting spree in a Munich McDonald’s, killing nine.”—The Wall Street Journal


But the effects of Merkel’s migration madness cannot be measured by terror incidents alone, whose number is still relatively small. A largely unreported effect has utterly changed daily life in Germany. Soeren Kern reported on Germany’s migrant rape epidemic in September, 2015. In March, 2016, he wrote: “The problem has now spread to cities and towns in all 16 of Germany’s federal states.” He describes over 160 sexual attacks on women, girls, boys, in just the first two months of 2016. This reporter, during several visits, found Germany to be a very safe country only five years ago.

An appalling report on everyday life in Germany, titled “Multikultistan: A House of Horrors for Ordinary Germans,” was released by WikiLeaks, among John Podesta’s incoming e-mails. Read it here.

Read about no-go zones here; how German courts bow to Sharia law here; about national crime wave here; about child marriage here.

In a piece titled Germans Leaving Germany in Droves, Soeren Kern quotes from letters written by exiles to German officials, explaining why they left. One of them included this telling sentence: “It is a shame that in Germany Jews must again be afraid to be Jews.”


Abuse of women is hard-wired, through Sharia law, into “honor/shame societies”—which are prevalent in Muslim countries.

Professors Valerie Hudson, Bonnie Ballif-Spanvill, Mary Caprioli, and Chad Emmett explain in a study titled Sex and World Peace, how honor/shame societies function and how abuse of women passes from one generation to the next:

If [a woman’s] sexual relations and attendant behavior, such as manner of dress, do not conform to this model [chasteness], her activities are viewed as bringing chaos and instability to the group. Thus, the need to protect a woman becomes … the need to protect her chastity…. Her life and her freedom are both subordinate to the goal of ensuring her chastity.

They quote Serap Cileli, author of We Are Your Daughters, Not Your Honor:

“In many families, boys grow up as first class citizens and girls are second class citizens. Boys see their fathers hitting their mothers and learn to abuse their wives….”

The four authors describe the tortured life of girls and women in honor/shame societies:

A girl may be withdrawn from school as soon as she hits puberty, for her sexuality cannot be assured [when] she may have to walk long distances to school or have a male teacher. A girl may even be married well before puberty—sometimes at seven or eight years of age—to avoid any possibility that her reputation may be destroyed first.

Or worse may occur, as in one horrific 2005 case in Pakistan:

They tell the story of Nazir Ahmed, a Pakistani father who “cut the throat of his stepdaughter Muqadas with a machete, [her mother] looking helpessly on from the corner of the room as he then killed his three daughters—Bano, 8, Sumaira, 7, and Humaira, 4.”
“I thought the younger girls would do what their eldest sister had done, so they should be eliminated,” he told police. Muqadas had been (falsely) accused of adultery by her husband.

Muslim immigrants can and do bring these traditions to America. There are 23–27 honor killings annually in America—the DOJ


An Arabic-speaking Christian translator at German asylum centers reveals that “Muslim migrants show ‘pure hatred’ toward Christians and want the country to be Islamized,” the Daily Mail reports. The migrants she deals with don’t know she’s Christian.

“’Some women told me, “We will multiply our numbers. We must have more children than the Christians because it’s the only way we can destroy them here.”’

Thus they carry out Muhammad’s directive, called the Hijra, for Muslims to spread Sharia law everywhere on the planet.


The Left and the Media conceal the negative results of Islamic immigration on both sides of the Atlantic, with apparently the same motive—to keep the flow coming.

Soeren Kern reports on German police concealing migrant rapes, and Pamela Geller reports on Muslim gangs marauding through Minneapolis threatening rape. The state’s largest newspaper ignored the incident, she wrote, and TV coverage “scrubbed the ‘Muslim’ (Somali) out of their report.”

Insanely, since 9/11 Muslim immigration has doubled in America—1.6 million had been admitted, through 2013. Immigration from Muslim countries is the fastest growing segment—Conservative Review. According to Pew Research, the Muslim population is expected to triple by 2050 – from 2.77 million to 8.1 million.”

In December, 2015 Congress funded entrance of “nearly 300,000 Muslim migrants in the next 12 months alone.” Sen. Ted Cruz commented:

[The bill] will] set the U.S. on an autopilot path to approve green cards, asylee, and refugee status to approximately 170,000 migrants from Muslim countries during the next fiscal year. In addition to that would tens of thousands of temporary visas for entry and employment, and the entire sum is added to the rest of the annual autopilot green card, asylee, refugee, and foreign worker flow.


On January 7, 2017, President Trump issued an executive order (temporarily) banning entrance to people from seven mostly Muslim countries from entering America; this was to keep out any who might be a threat while standards for “extreme vetting” were developed.  This was met with a storm of PC protest and lawsuits over alleged violation of the travelers’ constitutional rights—though foreigners obviously do not have constitutional rights.

Trump’s plan is to vet applicants’ social media, contacts and other info, plus ensure they support America’s values.  CNN reported that a “senior campaign official” indicated they’d be queried about their attitudes toward women, Christians, and gays. A good idea, but a judge in Hawaii blocked even that.

Extreme vetting is better than what what we had before, but it won’t prevent Muslim immigrants from using taqiyya (Sharia-permissible lying) to give the right answers.

Proper vetting can keep out a terrorist, but it can’t prevent the immigrant—or his children—from being radicalized in America: even second-generation Muslims are infinitely more at risk of online or in-mosque radicalization than members of any other religion. Omar Mateen, for example, who murdered 49 in Orlando, was born in New Hyde Park, NY, of Afghan parents.

Breitbart reported on a comment made January 2, 2017 by a British-born member of Poland’s parliament: “When it comes to reducing the chances of Poland being hit by [Islamist] terror attacks, the only proven method is to not allow in Muslim migrants,” Ryszard Czarnecki told local radio.”  He was responding to an attack in London two days earlier that had “killed seven and injured at least 48 others.” Czarnecki added, “Poland is ‘learning from the mistakes’ of other nations in the West, and so refuses to ‘open [its] doors to Islamic migrants.’”

After the Manchester, UK terror attack claimed the lives of 23 including a Polish couple, “Prime Minister Beata Szydło condemned the ‘political elites’ of Europe and warned the continent must put in place ‘strong politicians’ who are willing to tackle terrorism.”

“Szydło said: ‘Where are you headed Europe?… Rise from your knees and from your lethargy or you will be crying over your children every day.'”

Has America learned from the mistakes of European nations? When our president tried to block immigration from several Muslim-majority nations with terrorism problems or were unable to provide info needed to vet immigrants, he was repeatedly blocked by radical federal judges.

Although Congress has the authority to limit the jurisdiction of the courts, absolutely no discussion of exercising that authority took place. Only Rep Louis Gohmert said on Fox News last June 4th: “At a minimum, we in Congress have got to make clear—we created those courts, every one except the Supreme Court—and we can take this travel ban issue right out from under their jurisdiction. They have no business ruling on that.”

Of course, Senate Majority Leader McConnell would have to change the rules to eliminate the obviously obsolete filibuster, so that a simple majority could accomplish that. The president should decry the chaos of activist attorneys general and judges blocking his every effort to control immigration and keep America safe. He should publicly demand that McConnell give up his precious filibuster, so he can keep his campaign promise.

If that is done, the president will have to take the Polish prime minister’s words to heart.


Will President Trump invoke the only strategy that will truly work: strictly limiting the numbers of Muslims allowed to enter America? That is a decision that will raise a typhoon of protest, but it’s is one the president has the statutory right to make. 8 USC § 1182(f):

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

Foreign students from Muslim nations is one area badly needing attention. According to Breitbart, “103,307 students coming from 19 countries in the Middle East and North Africa in the 2014-15 academic year did not undergo vetting to detect jihadist sympathies.”

Many of them are involved in radical Muslim organizations in universities, like Students for Justice in Palestine, which is on 200 campuses nationwide. According to Discover the Networks, SJP was in essence formed to wage a campus war against Israel. We could add “indoctrination” to that: DTN gives numerous examples of SJP’s support of individual terrorists and terror organizations and holding events honoring people like the Muslim Brotherhood’s founder.

SJP also pushes the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement; suppresses the speech rights of Jewish students, spreads anti-Semitism and violence, and links with Marxist groups like Black Lives Matter.

The Muslim Student Association is another such group, with some 600 campus chapters. Discover the Networks describes MSA as “a key lobbying organization for the Wahhabi sect of Islam.” 


If we don’t heed the warnings from Europe, we should heed this one: Dr. James Mitchell, onetime interrogator of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohamed, said on Fox News December 21st that he spoke with KSM years later about terror attacks. He quoted KSM: “‘The easiest way to win the long battle to take over the world with Sharia law is through immigration and outbreeding non-Muslims.’

“Likeminded jihadi brothers would immigrate to Western democracies …,” Mitchell said, “wrap themselves in our civil liberties for protection; they would support themselves in our welfare systems, while they spread their jihadi message. When the time was right, they would rise up and attack.”