New Consensus on Global Warming to Make Al Gore Ill


The computer models responsible for every climate prediction have been greatly exaggerated. Many are just plain wrong. Surprisingly, the consensus is starting to change and more closely resemble that of the climate lukewarmers.

Every time a climate computer prediction is proven to be inaccurate, the climate dictators simply change the models. They tone down the predictions to match reality.

Science is supposed to work in reverse.


Dramatic Changes in Climate Science Predictions Coming

There has been no significant global warming for nearly two decades. That is something global alarmists have been averse to accepting until now.

There is a budding consensus among more and more climate scientists that accepts the hiatus in global warming.

A new paper by climate scientist Benjamin Santer discusses the failure of climate models to predict or replicate the “slowdown” in early 21st century global temperatures. Climate skeptics have been derided for saying that.

All of the global warming predictions are based on computer models. The scientists feeding the computer models have ignored the obvious facts when setting them up.

Garbage in, garbage out.

The paper adds to the ever-growing volume of “hiatus” literature embracing popular arguments advanced by skeptics, and even uses satellite temperature datasets to show reduced atmospheric warming.

via Daily Caller

“In the early twenty-first century, satellite-derived tropospheric warming trends were generally smaller than trends estimated from a large multi-model ensemble,” reads the abstract of Santer’s paper, which was published Monday.

“Over most of the early twenty-first century, however, model tropospheric warming is substantially larger than observed,” reads the abstract, adding that “model overestimation of tropospheric warming in the early twenty-first century is partly due to systematic deficiencies in some of the post-2000 external forcings used in the model simulations.”

This is a dramatic statement – they’ve exaggerated.

Antarctic ice hasn’t changed in 100 years

In addition, last November, the logbooks of the failed Shackleton expedition proved the Antarctic ice showed imperceptible changes in 100 years.

Climate scientists want people to believe that’s not the case as they use a fissure in the Antarctic ice to bolster their hysteria.

Reports came out today over a crack in the Antarctic ice that will produce a giant iceberg 300 feet wide and a third of a mile deep. It could cause the sea levels to rise.

This Nov. 10, 2016 aerial photo released by NASA, shows a rift in the Antarctic Peninsula’s Larsen C ice shelf. According to NASA, IceBridge scientists measured the Larsen C fracture to be about 70 miles long, more than 300 feet wide and about a third of a mile deep. (John Sonntag/NASA via AP)

The media is reporting that this is after President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Treaty as if the two had some connection. The treaty would have done nothing to help this fissure. The treaty isn’t about climate, it’s about redistributing U.S. resources to foreign nations. In fact, El Nino caused the Larsen C rift. We can’t do anything about that.