NY Times Editor Admits They Are Trying to Turn America Against Trump

1
Share

Update: The NY Times digital gatekeeper Nicholas Dudich who was the subject of the first two Project Veritas videos has been fired over ‘damaging’ video.

The London New York Times homepage editor was caught on James O’Keefe’s undercover video admitting to corruption without seeming to know it’s corrupt.

The New York Times editor, Desiree Shoe, slammed Vice President Mike Pence as “fu**ing horrible” and insisted that the media’s slanted coverage is geared to turn America against Trump and his administration.

She believes the President is crazy and Pence is too religious which to her means they had to help sway the election. While she admits the stories are “supposed to be objective”, it’s “hard to portray the President in an unbiased light when the words that come out of his mouth are apologetic to white supremacists”.

“If you impeach him,” you get Pence and he could be worse. She said he is very religious and condoned conversion therapy which is not true. The bias against religion and people who are religious is growing.

She admits to the need for clicks online and they want to meet the desires of readers. The Times reports the news through the prism of the left.

The Project Veritas investigations have caused the Times to alter its social media policy. In a nutshell, the Times told newsroom employees — even those who don’t cover politics — that they should not share personal opinions on their personal social media accounts.

This was met with derision by journalists at other publications. O’Keefe’s exposés moved them in this direction. In the end, it enables the NY Times to hide their biased left-wing staff.

Share

1 COMMENT

  1. We see how this “evil” partisanship in news organizations gives these same organizations the cloak of virtue when it is more superficial than authoritative.

    I was watching the Greek PM and Trump at their news conference and one of the first questions was asked by John Roberts of FoxNews which he asked the PM about a remark about not wanting this evil in his country. No doubt such a reporter “believes” he is being tough and engaging for the greater “good”. What it shows is truly how clueless these established reporters truly are. After Roberts’ disgusting question there was one from a Greek reporter. The difference in decorum from This reporter was astounding. It should be no surprise, even though I always expect Our reporters to learn from their foreign counterparts. Our reporters are more comparable to Paparazzi’s then Real journalists. When analyzing Roberts in asking such questions it’s as if he thought it was cute. Roberts and the majority of the White House Press Corps should be relegated to desk jobs and place people who can DO the job in their place.

    It would be quite informative if some organization would take All these press events and analyze the reporters and their questions. Such an analysis could differentiate between those reporters who Are reporters and the others who grandstand and ask the dumbest of questions. When there was a Press conference that covered Health Care Acosta, for one of many, just could NOT comprehend the difference between Insurance and HealthCARE. I Do Not have insurance but I DO have Healthcare because the needs I have I pay “Out of Pocket”. Since I have to pay this in any event why should I shell out money when I STILL would have to pay “Out of Pocket”. Acosta could never understand this reality. Therefore I submit the main qualification to be a journalist is a course in Stupidity.

Comments are closed.