The WSJ article I have linked here is a good one for people to read. The point being made is one that has become clear to me as I’ve listened to all the overly-complicated reasons as to why Obama cannot support Israel’s attempts to protect themselves from an existential threat because it is a Sophie’s Choice.
When are people going to understand what is going on here? There is always an excuse from Obama but there is never an appropriate or timely response of any kind.
I am not looking for war. If Obama had inflicted the tougher sanctions in time (talked the talk and walked the walk), we would not be where we are today.
Instead, Obama has rewarded terrorists with money and pitiful pleas for negotiations while selling Israel out and telling them to move back their borders to indefensible positions. He wants to give back UNESCO funding that was rightfully taken away because the U.N. voted to award the PA terrorists statehood. The Egyptians are trying 19 innocent aide workers and what does Obama want to do? He wants to rush $2 billion to them so as not to upset them and have them back down on the treaty with Israel – like they aren’t going to anyway???
Israel will have no choice but to go in, bomb the nuclear sites and get out. We should be there with them if it becomes necessary as a result of Neville Obama’s lack of leadership. Do you think we will support them?
Since Obama is so brilliant and well-educated, I have to assume this is part of a plan.
We are at a point in which there is little time left before Iran has the bomb and Obama is still threatening, not implementing, the toughest sanctions (freezing the bank assets). He continues to deliberate endlessly. In fairness, he is sending planes and ships to the area for maneuvers though he did cancel one that got some bad press in the ME.
Foremost in Obama’s mind is the election from what I have observed. He cares about making the U.S. a socialist country and appears to have no regard for Israel.
The one thing I do believe is that he is on a path to let Iran get the nuclear bomb as he (Obama) destroys the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
Obama is afraid the Iranians will close the Straits as if we couldn’t get them back opened soon enough. He is afraid of China and Russia – everyone knows Obama is cowed. Obama thinks that if Iran gets the bomb they will be calmer and feel less threatened…the list goes on. Given the fact that Iran has candidly expressed their plan is to destroy Israel and the U.S. in order to bring back the 12th Mahdi, I don’t know why he would even consider inaction as a possibility.
Let us talk about former National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter and Advisor to President Obama, Zbigniew Brzesinski who trained Osama Bin Laden and what is now known as Al Quaeda. He gave an interview to The Daily Beast in ’09 which clearly expresses his views about blowing Israel out of the sky and I suggest to you that it is Obama’s thinking as well or he would not have hired the guy –
“They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch? … We have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a ‘Liberty’ in reverse.” ~ Zbigniew Brzesinski
The lunatic ZB wants to blow Israel out of the sky if they attack Iran to save themselves.
Samantha Powers, Obama’s National Security Advisor, does not understand that it is not Israel trying to commit genocide. The genocide being threatened is against Israel. In the following video, she seems to think the U.S. should go in to the Middle East to protect the terrorists from the Israelis.
What is so hard for people to understand? Of course, Obama does not support Israel. Is there a chance he will support an air strike by Israel on Iran’s nuclear facilities – of course, depending on polling.
I ask you, however, to consider one thing – why does he hire people like Zbigniew Brzesinski and Samantha Powers if he is planning to support Israel?
Powers is the one who told him to go into Libya on humanitarian grounds as you might remember.
Obama and Powers like war well enough – when it is to support their victimized terrorists or is it oil? The humanitarian argument is no longer being used as people are being massacred in Syria.
WSJ:…By EDWARD N. LUTTWAK: As the pros and cons of attacking Iran’s nuclear installations are debated, Americans are confronted by equally confident but contradictory assertions about the possible scope of Iran’s retaliation or the impact on the stability of the regime. Some hope the possession of nuclear weapons will moderate Tehran’s fanatics. They argue that’s what happened with China under Mao Zedong. Others note that extremism has never been reduced by empowerment.
And so the debate continues inconclusively while Iran’s nuclear efforts persist—along with daily threats of death to America, Israel, Britain, Saudi Arabia’s rulers, and more.
Yet everyone seems to assume the scope of the attack itself is a fixed parameter—a take-it-or-leave-it proposition that some fear to take and others dread to leave undone. That, by all accounts, is exactly how the issue was framed when the debate started in the last years of the second George W. Bush administration. This is misleading. The magnitude and intensity of an attack is a matter of choice, and it needs to be on the table…Read here: WSJ
In this video, ZB is exhilarated over the loss of Western power and welcomes the re-emergence of Russia. He is a globalist who sees the Atlantic powers as an enemy. When you listen to him, you are listening to Obama. Does he speak for you?