The Obama Administration is not to be trusted. They lie because they believe the end justifies the means.
I present the following evidence to prove my point.
1. The Obama Administration Shamelessly Lied About Benghazi – Check Out the Latest
There is powerful new evidence that confirms the Obama Administration knew the Benghazi attack was a planned terrorist attack.
What we know from the latest survivor testimony given this week before Congress behind closed doors is the attack was planned, the Administration knew early on that it was a terrorist attack, and, contrary to John Brennan’s lies, the survivors were asked to sign non-disclosure agreements at the memorial ceremony.
2. Health Insurance Lies And a Lying Media
The entire healthcare bill was passed with bribery and sold on lies. Not only do we have a president and an administration that lies, we have his state-sponsored newspaper to lie for him. Mr. Obama would prefer that we think of him as incompetent and unaware.
He claimed that he was unaware there were problems with the website and he found out when we all did.
He would have us believe that he didn’t realize people would lose their insurance until it happened. Whether you think he lied or is completely and irredeemably incompetent, only the NY Times could call it something more innocuous.
The New York Times editorial published on November 13th, said this: ‘”These are made-for-media story lines: the mighty, tech-savvy Obama-bots brought to heel by a tech snafu, and the well-spoken president being undone by a ‘misspoken’ promise. A comeuppance for the too-cool commander in chief.”‘
Translation: Obama is too-cool and he misspoke. The in-house incompetents he employed to develop the site had a tech snafu.
On November 12th, the NY Times said this: “The split between lawmakers and the White House reflects the dilemma the president finds himself in as he seeks to follow through on last week’s acknowledgment about his incorrect promise on health care coverage. Hundreds of thousands of people have received cancellation notices from health insurance companies because their plans do not conform with minimum standards set by the new law.”
Translation: Obama made an incorrect promise.
It’s not just the NY Times. It’s most of them. The media has called the lies ‘imprecise promises, soundbites, pithy,’ et al. Check out more on the Hotair link.
The truth is that in 2010, Mr. Obama knew at least 8 or 9 million would lose their insurance.
CANTOR: …Because I don’t think you can answer the question in the positive to say that people will be able to maintain their coverage, people will be able to see the doctors they want, in the kind of bill that you are proposing:
OBAMA: Since you asked me a question, let me respond. The 8 to 9 million people you refer to that might have to change their coverage — keep in mind out of the 300 million Americans that we are talking about — would be folks who the CBO, the Congressional Budget Office, estimates would find the deal in the exchange better — would be a better deal. So, yes, they would change coverage because they got more choice and competition.
In a June 2010 edition of the Federal Register, administration officials predicted massive disruption of the private insurance market. Forbes reported that the register indicated from “50 to 75 percent” of people who buy coverage on their own are likely to receive cancellation notices due to Obamacare.
In 2010, when Sen. Enzi attempted to pass a bill that would stop the cancelled policies, every Democrat voted against it, but they claim they knew nothing and still know nothing about policies being cancelled.
Recently, on The Kelly File, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, one of the Obamacare architects blamed the insurance companies for canceling the policies, even though they had no choice since Sebelius wrote a rule making it impossible for them to continue their policies as ‘legal’. He also blamed Fox News for the underfunding of Obamacare.
3. Mr. Obama’s Lawless Law Enforcement Chief, Eric Holder
Constitutional attorney, KrisAnne Hall has repeatedly asked why Eric Holder has been allowed to continue his lawless behavior without being called on it by Congress.
Yesterday, Rep. Olson of TX introduced Articles of Impeachment against Holder. The following Representatives are co-sponsoring: Rep. Larry Buschon (R-IN), Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-TX), Rep. Randy Weber (R-TX), Rep. Phil Roe (R-TN), Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA), Rep.Roger Williams (R-TX), and Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL).
The Articles of Impeachment lay out four charges:
- Refusal to comply with the subpoena issued by the Oversight Committee regarding Fast and Furious. This violates 2 U.S.C. 192
- Failure to enforce DOMA, the Controlled Substances Act, and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. This violates the AG’s oath of office.
- Refusal to prosecute the IRS officials involved in the targeting and disclosure of tax records to political donors. This violates Mr. Holder’s oath.
- False testimony under oath before Congress in May 2013 about the Justice Department investigation of journalist James Rosen. This is a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621.
Whether you agree with the particular issues or not, Eric Holder has violated his oath of office knowingly on more than one occasion. Read more on KrisAnneHall’s link.
4. How About Bringing UP the Stimulus Lie For Old Time’s Sake
When the nearly one trillion dollar stimulus was not ‘shovel ready’ as promised, Mr. Obama thought it was good for a laugh: