The fundamental transformation of the traditional family and traditional marriage has always been the goal of people who live in untraditional families. Gay marriage redefined the traditional definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman. It opened the door for any type of union among men, women and who knows what else in time.
We now have federal judge in Utah who ruled cohabitation is legal, striking down key parts of the anti-polygamy law. It allows common law marriage and polygamy can no longer be prosecuted.
The polygamous Brown family who won their lawsuit in the US District Court in Utah
Judge Clark Waddoup, in a 91-page ruling, issued on friday struck down key parts of Utah’s polygamy law and found on behalf of the polygamous Brown family.
The parts of the law that make cohabitation illegal are in violation of the 1st and 14th amendments, the judge found. He said that cohabitation does not equate to being married.
He so narrowly defined the words ‘marry’ and ‘purports to marry’ that bigamy remains illegal only in the literal sense, when someone fraudulently acquires multiple marriage licenses.
Jonathan Turley represented them and called the opinion ‘magnificent.’ He said it will allow ‘plural families to step out for the first time in their communities and live their lives openly among their neighbors.’
They don’t mention here that many of these families are on government welfare and many of these relationships include subservient women and abusive men.
Next up, polyamory, whereby one can marry any and all and also have extramarital affairs.
As Russian-American gay activist, Masha Alexandrovna Gessen, speaking at a conference in Sydney, Australia, said, she hates lying about the purpose of gay marriage which, she asserts, is to destroy the institution of marriage.
“It’s a no-brainer that [homosexuals] should have the right to marry [each other], but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. … (F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.
“The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.
“I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”
The fundamental transformation of our country includes the destruction of the traditional family and traditional marriage. It is the destruction of tradition.
This woman has a very weird life:
Read more at the Salt Lake Tribune