When did parents lose their rights to parent their own children? When did fat children lose their rights? As usual, government officials have all good intentions. How about they mind their own business and stop with their self-righteous good intentions?
How do these busybodies know they are not damaging the childrens’ self-image. Then there is the potential for embarrassment – it’s like wearing an ankle monitor while on parole. Why don’t the officials just teach the children about good health and keep the $90 monitors for themselves – most of them are probably fat.
Parents had no idea that this monitoring was being done. They were left out of a decision to strap a monitor on their overweight children and we allow this? There was a time when the parents would be storming the Principal’s office.
Why don’t we strap one of these of Michelle Obama, she’s no lightweight or how about the fat adults in the school?
And by the way, that whole nonsense about it taking a village to raise a child comes from the writings of a commie epistemologist and more recently from a commie blowhard, Hillary Clinton. It doesn’t take a village of intrusive know-it-alls, it takes a set of caring parents.
NY Post: A group of Long Island students will soon be wearing controversial electronic monitors that allow school officials to track their physical activity around the clock.
The athletics chair for the Bay Shore schools ordered 10 Polar Active monitors, at $90 a pop, for use starting this spring. The wristwatchlike devices count heartbeats, detect motion and even track students’ sleeping habits in a bid to combat obesity.
The information is displayed on a color-coded screen and gets transmitted to a password-protected Web site that students and educators can access.
But Ted Nagengast, the Bay Shore athletics chair, said, “It’s a great reinforcement in fighting the obesity epidemic. It tells kids, in real time, ‘Am I active? Am I not active?’ We want to give kids the opportunity to become active.”
The monitors are distributed by Polar Electro, of Lake Success, LI, the US division of a Finland firm.
In the South Orange-Maplewood School District, where earlier versions of the devices have been used for two years, upper-grade students’ marks in phys ed are based in part on heart-rate monitors and activity sensors.
Teachers use hand-held computers to collect data from each student’s wrist monitor during class, then upload the information to the school computer system for storage and long-term tracking.
But privacy advocates and parents worry that schools are using electronic monitors in phys ed without families’ knowledge or consent.
“I didn’t even know it was going on, and I’m active in the school,” said Beth Huebner, of St. Louis.
Her son, a fourth-grader, wore a Polar Active monitor in class without her OK last fall at Ross Elementary School.
“We have gotten no information about the Web-site security or where the data will go,” Huebner said.
“When you get into monitoring people’s biological vital signs, that’s a pretty intrusive measurement,” said Jay Stanley, of the American Civil Liberties Union. “There are key privacy interests at play.”
At the very least, says Stanley, parents must have a say in how long the data will be stored and who will have access to it and schools must obtain parents’ consent.
“A program like this should only be voluntary. Nobody should be forced to reveal biological indicators,” he said.
“It’s all about secondary use,” said Virginia Rezmierski, an expert on information technology and privacy at the University of Michigan.
“Does the data pass along with the child from school to school? When will insurance companies want to get access to it? Will a school want to medicate a child that the monitor identifies as hyperactive? It’s potentially very dangerous ground.”