Tolerant Left Violently Shuts Downs Conservative Speaker at Berkeley

5
Share

While calling Milo Yiannopoulos a fascist, violent protesters at Berkeley shut down Yiannopoulos’s speaking engagement and a future one. The venue was evacuated over an hour before it was scheduled to begin, after masked left-wing protesters stormed the venue, overturning police barricades, flipping cars, and lighting fires. The masked rioters threw fireworks towards police officers, according to Breitbart.

Pre-printed “no to fascism” signs seen in the photo.

College Republicans brought Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos in to speak and the fascists didn’t approve.

Berkeley is charging the College Republicans $10 thousand for security. Why don’t they get the money from the rioters?

Milo discussed it with Tucker Wednesday evening.

Share

5 COMMENTS

  1. You just know for sure that they “left”, right? There’s brainwashing all over, and it’s used to divide people and make them hate each other. Good job. One day you’ll wake up and see who’s really pulling the strings, and its not any of us.

  2. There was a time when Americans believed in freedom.

    The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the kneejerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.

    Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led to DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, childseat laws, and pet seatbelt laws. Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.

    Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a cellphone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.

    The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purposes of more laws are control and revenue generation for the state.

    Another reason laws are enacted is because corporations give donations to lawmakers to stifle competition or increase sales.

    Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.

    Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?

    Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine? Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people educate or talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people be sued for annoying behavior? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too? Do people have consciences? Having no laws doesn’t mean actions have no consequences.

    If there is no victim, there is no crime.

    We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10.

    Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.

    Should swimming pools be banned because they are dangerous? Hammers? Bottles? Rocks? Energy drinks? Pillows?

    Where does it end?

    Control freaks might get angry when a neighbor owns three indoor cats, but what did the neighbor take from them? Why should this be illegal? Is outlawing cats something a free country should do? Doesn’t banning everything sound like the opposite of freedom?

    Instead of getting mad at people who like freedom, why don’t people realize that freedom is a two way street?

    If you allow others to paint their house purple then you can, too.

    If you allow others to own a gun then you can, too.

    If you allow others to swear then you can, too.

    If you allow others to gamble then you can, too.

    Who wants to live in a prison?

    Think. Question everything.

  3. The “Participation Award” generation will soon be under the control of the Kids who were raised by Conservative / Republicans !! Because these P.A. kids won’t know how to survive without the adults in the room. I look at who President Trump is picking to run our Country and my heart soars with HOPE !!!.

    These kids should all be put into Prison. I bet their liberal parents are proud.

  4. Well, the uneducated imbeciles at Berkeley just protested against American Freedom of Speech. Is that what today’s colleges teach hate, how to be anti American, and surely they must be teaching them how to be a clueless uneducated liberal moron. The childish whiny morons haven’t a clue of what America is about, what our freedoms are, and why we want to keep them. In other words, they are clueless uneducated imbeciles, because you couldn’t possibly have a real education and do what these morons at Berkeley just did. And the same goes for most all of these left wing liberal protester’s, most haven’t a clue of what they are protesting if you ever asked one of the protesting morons.

Comments are closed.