Climate Change and the U.N.’s Agenda 21 are inextricably tied. Global warming requires Agenda 21 and Agenda 21 exists because of global warming or climate change. Fulfillment of Agenda 21’s goals will forever alter private property rights in the United States.
What is Agenda 21?
UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world, according to Rosa Koire, founder of Democrats Against U.N. Agenda 21.
The U.N. believes in keeping the Agenda local. They believe in the systematic takeover and control of land and water by the smallest government entities on up.
They do this through ICLEI which is “the global cities network of 12 mega-cities, 100 super-cities and urban regions, 450 large cities, 450 small and medium-sized cities and towns in 84 countries dedicated to sustainable development,” according to their own website.
The U.S. has contributed $43.6 million USD to the U.N.’s IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) since 1989. The IPCC relies on U.S. money for its very existence and without it, the IPCC would not be able to produce its scams. They are the research arm. They make the proclamations and declare the formulas for change.
We don’t know if global warming is a normal occurrence in the earth’s history because we do not have records of prior climate changes though we know they existed just as ice ages existed. We don’t know if man is causing the climate to change and we don’t know if we can impact it.
Nonetheless, the U.N. has become the international body overseeing climate change and the U.S. is acceding to their demands that we basically fund. Those demands will irrevocably alter private property rights in the United States.
The government has almost $3 billion of your tax dollars to coordinate numerous government agencies through the GlobalChange.gov, whose sole purpose it is to force “clean air” and “clean water” policies on the nation via Executive Order or rules and regulations.
Global Change “coordinates and integrates Federal research on changes in the global environment and their implications for society.” In other words, the money is used to promote the climate change agenda.
Their April report compiled by 13 government agencies and issued by the U.S. Global Change Research Program unsurprisingly predicts climate-fueled storms, flooding, and droughts that will cause “cascading system failures” unless we make immediate changes, despite the fact that we don’t know if we can affect the weather at all.
For now, Global Change is accumulating the research and building the networks to force their vision on the American people.
Their networking is intimidating to the powerless among us. They are establishing a “networks of 42 networks” to communicate and promote their “products.” They plan to partner with organizations, private sector, government, non-governmental organizations and professional societies. They intend to invade every sector of society.
None of their research includes one bit of data from scientists who have alternative views of climate change.
They believe that only the government can protect our land, seas, and animals. The government, however, is so large and there are so many laws, that the government or even rogue government employees can do whatever it or they want to citizens.
They claim land is national forest land and mandate private land owners give up their land or reserve a certain percentage of their land for the animals. In Kern County, California alone, there are 400 projects planned.
Open land is targeted and there is a push to move people into crowded city sprawls to save the planet and the animals.
The Fifth Assessment Report issued by the U.N. International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) on September 27. 2013, claimed that manmade Global Warming was attributed in large part to CO2 emissions. The answer to the problem in their view is to preserve more and more land as open spaces free of the polluter – man.
There premise is based in part on sketchy historical data and suppositions.
Land use is one of the issues Global Change will deal with and we should be very concerned.
They are using “endangered” or “threatened” species to seize control over the land and the bodies of water in our country. Landowners have to worry about having their land seized or completely controlled because of frogs and chickens fraudulently “protected” by the government after “sue and settle” cases are “resolved”.
The Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act are being used to write laws in the name of regulations.
The EPA has recently issued new rules that apply pollution regulations to the country’s alleged “intermittent and ephemeral streams and wetlands” — which are created during wet seasons, or simply after it rains, but are temporary.”
The Clean Water Act is being used to regulate “U.S. waters” which includes ditches, ponds, marshes, that have no direct connection to navigable waterways.
Thirty-six states have legal limitations to prevent the EPA from regulating waters not covered by the Clean Water Act.
There are exemptions to this new rule for farmers but only if they engage in ongoing conversion practices that comply with Natural Resources Conservation Services standards.
“Once the landowner completes the conservation practice or changes the use of his land, he loses his EPA exemption and must now comply with a new, and more complex, set of rules.”
Rep. Steve Stockman of Texas said. “In other words, the only way a farmer or rancher can exempt himself from the EPA rule is to adhere to a mountain of other new federal rules.”
Check out the frightening story of the Hages, Nevada ranchers who suffered under government abuse for decades.
Nevada rancher E. Wayne Hage has been fighting the federal government for decades over his historical rights to water livestock, irrigate his ranch, and use water for domestic purposes.
The government hounded the family out of business over cow trespassing. Mr. Hages was forced to go back to school for a law degree to fight for his rights because he would never have been able to afford a lawyer.
Last May, a court sided with the Hages. The judge found that the Hages owed the government $125.84 in damages and he ordered the government to return all the grazing permits previously taken away from the family.
According to the Pacific Legal Foundation, the government agencies weren’t satisfied with just taking their grazing permits away, they conspired “to deprive them of their water rights and solicited and granted temporary grazing rights to others in areas where the Hage family had historically ranged their cattle and held a priority interest.
And the feds sent trespass notices to people who leased or sold cattle to the Hages in order to pressure other parties not to do business with the Hages, and even to discourage or punish testimony in the lawsuit.”
The family has been awarded $14 million which they have yet to see because the government is appealing. The case will continue through the courts and hopefully the Supreme Court will hear the case.
Climate change and Agenda 21 give the government the power to do anything they want over your property.