19 states join Texas in the suit against states that violate their own voter laws

7
987

Updates: As of the evening of December 9th, it’s up to 19 states: Arizona, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia vs. Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin.

Texas is suing Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin for changing their election processes immediately before the election and doing so illegally. The lawsuit was described as “ridiculous,” “preposterous,” and bound to fail by the Left. However, we now have 17 states that have joined the lawsuit, along with the President.

Ignore that, let’s see you try!

The lawsuit contends that these states, by violating their own election laws [to enable ballot stuffing], have robbed voters in these 17 states of their rights. The four states in question have disenfranchised the voters of these 17 states.

In addition to Missouri, the other red states pushing for Texas’s court fight are Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Indiana, Louisiana, North Dakota, Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, Tennessee, and West Virginia.

In support of the Texas case, the states filed an amicus brief, known as a friend-of-the-court brief, arguing the justices should review the matter.

“When non-legislative actors in other states encroach on the authority of the ‘legislature thereof’ in that state to administer a presidential election, they threaten the liberty, not just of their own citizens, but of every citizen of the United States who casts a lawful ballot in that election,” the brief read.

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 years ago

Well that will be helpful in drawing the battle lines for civil war 2.

Eric the Constitutionalist
4 years ago

God save America

MAGA
4 years ago

“When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

Greg
4 years ago

For any of those who assume this is a waste of time, or as a Fox News contributor said, Zero chance. According to SCOTUS rules on a leave to file a “Bill of Complaint”, they could have just ignored it. Instead, it was actually “docketed”. That is No small matter. Respondents are now required to answer. This is not as the Fox contributor says, a matter of Texas wanting it their way, but lays out specifically violations of Election laws BY those states in question. Essentially, those states brought it upon themselves. It’s certainly a novel approach and it is precisely a “novel” approach that perks interest by SCOTUS.

One thing we will never know is, what effect has the proposal to “pack the court”, along with rotations, on the Justices, as a whole. We do know many Senators are in favor, and could very well go along to get along. A Majority leader wields a great deal of power over Senators. Biden has also give some indications he, too, is willing. Nothing would put the “fear of God” into every Justice, including the most liberal, to have the Senate essentially strip them of authority. If the Justices Aren’t considering this, they damn well better. This is not the country of FDR. It is far more extreme. To them, Extremism in the defense of “their” liberty is no vice.

I Turned Into A Martian
4 years ago
Reply to  Greg

FDR was the original FunDamental transfoRmer.
Quick memory hole the internment camps!
Winston, paging Smith, Winston.

Greg
4 years ago

There’s one little fact left out in the internment camps saga. A few years ago I saw a PBS documentary about those camps and some who were in them. The first question which should be asked is ‘why’ weren’t all Japanese interned. One of those people actually admitted they were sent “simply because we wouldn’t sign a loyalty oath”. It’s just a bit suspicious why a certain segment of a population Refuse to sign an oath to a country fighting another which committed an Act of War against it. Once I heard that I lost sympathy for those who “chose a side”.

Meanwich Stinkburger
4 years ago

All comrade tactics are two way and can be used against them. Alinsky works for us now.