2nd Amendment, the Amendment You Can Lose, Sayeth the Left


“As of oligarchy so of tyranny … Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms.” Aristotle, Politics, Book 5, part x

The Second Amendment is the only Amendment that comes and goes, depending on the state you are in. The right to self-defense ends at one’s doorstep in some states but not in others.

Shall we also lose our First Amendment in the same way? Oh, wait, that has already happened. Conservatives do not have free speech in Berkeley. Freedom of Religion is also subject to the whims of people who hate religion as is the right to protest.

The left has the momentum going to gut the one Amendment that assures we keep the others.

Once one amendment falls, they all fall. The latest consideration is to take the right away based on age.

Shall we tell hunters, farmers, competitive shooters they can’t start until they are 21 years of age since one disturbed man was neglected by the system, including the FBI?

Shall we not have our right to privacy until we are 21 then as well?

There is no way the left will be satisfied with the ban on bump stocks or the tightening up on background checks. With more than 300 million guns in the country, they want to ban them all and make felons of the owners.

That would be quite a boon for the illegal gun trade.

The left relies on the mob and the children currently protesting just might be enough to provide justification for the mob. Who doesn’t love children and who doesn’t have a broken heart over the 17 lives lost last week at the hands of a mad killer? Humanitarianism is always an effective excuse for taking away one’s rights.


The case of District of Columbia vs. Heller determined that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.

In the Heller case, we were one vote away from losing the Second Amendment. In the dissenting opinion, Justice Stevens said, “There is no indication that the Framers intended to enshrine the common law right of self-defense in the Constitution.” He has also said at other times, we have the right to call “911.”

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens says your right to self-defense in your own home should be limited to a cellphone “at your bedside.”

The McDonald case worked hand-in-hand with Heller. The majority ruled in that case that states cannot unreasonably restrict the right self-defense.

Once we lose this Amendment, they will all fall.


The bump-stock discussion came up with the Las Vegas shooter that few seem to care much about. We have no real answers for that crime, but the Democratic Party has not asked questions.

Nothing will ever satisfy the left until and even after we are all enslaved by their ideology.

After the Vegas slaughter, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said, universal background checks would save lives, but “many other things” would have to be done as well. It would only be the beginning.

As far as bump-stocks are concerned, the Obama administration approved them. No one can quite understand why he did. The ATF said they didn’t have the right to regulated them.

The NRA has said they would like to see bump-stocks heavily regulated.

A bump stock takes the place of the gun’s shoulder rest with a “support step,” which covers the trigger opening. When the shooter pulls the trigger, the recoil causes the gun to “bump” the trigger again. It turns a semi-automatic into a poor excuse for an automatic, which are banned since 1986.

Bump-stocks don’t even work well.

Bump stocks are a rapid-fire gismo that can be duplicated using a simple belt. The left would love to eliminate all rapid-fire devices. The danger in that is it could lead to an end of magazines. The President has to be careful with this ban.

The left is going after rifles, like the AR-15. All they have to do is call it an assault rifle and much of the country thinks it is so.

Rapid-fire devices are also used in competitive shooting and they are used in law enforcement.

The left sees no need for a Second Amendment, but they are the same people who continually violate our rule of law and call the Constitution an “old piece of paper.”

In the end, there will be no end for the control freaks of the left. It won’t stop with guns. These are people who want to jail people for disagreeing with them on climate extremism.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 years ago

Boy, the media are SO ignorant. There’s been a number of people “destroying” their guns but when looking at the pictures they are merely “disassembled”.


The Sheriff of Broward had spoken about gun laws and he just made the statement, “if it doesn’t work, SO WHAT!”.

This is VERY DANGEROUS REMARKS. There are many Law Enforcement Officers that are fully willing to “ban” guns for civilians.

5 years ago

Hogg would have been better off going to the White House to offer solutions instead of seeking recognition via the media. His group had little to say except for “gun control” and blame Trump.

The session at the White House was an atmosphere that would likely move more people to find solutions. A noticeable sense of respect was in that room even from some who seemed anti-gun. Of course the kid who was anti-gun, who brought up Australia, also brought up the story that a man was able to buy an AR-15 within 5 minutes and an expired ID. He wasn’t aware That story was a hoax.

A Connecticut man said they found what works by identifying those who have predilections for violence and giving mental help or other means. People are accustomed to believe what works in one circumstance would follow to work in all cases. This is fallacious thinking as small communities have unique issues not common with large communities and vice versa. If he lives in a small community these policies could very well be effective, yet in large communities they would fail dramatically.

In the previous tragedies there wasn’t quite the coverage we have in this case, and here we have incontrovertible evidence the “system” failed in every respect. Therefore, the first step should be in holding those accountable who allowed it to escalate to that level. Cruz was well known as a trouble-maker at every level yet he was just pushed aside and allowed to fester. Granted most trouble-makers do not resort to such extreme violence but in this case it Was know about the “gun issue” and therefore that is the cause for accountability.