9 Gun Facts Anyone Can Understand


Check out the 9 gun facts below because they are the facts Barack Obama and other gun grabbers will never tell the public.

Thanks to Barack Obama’s continuous anti-gun speeches which twist the truth, the rest of the world is demonizing us and our Second Amendment rights. Obama knows it and it’s meant to put more pressure on us.

Mr. Obama never makes mention of the fact that we have serious gang violence in the U.S. He ignores the violence in his own hometown of Chicago which has lain witness to 55 shootings last weekend alone. The foreign media doesn’t necessarily delve into the facts. Instead, they repeat Obama’s distortions and blast it on their front pages.

This is just one more way that Obama hurts America before the world simply to get an agenda through.

The guardian’s Friday headline read, ‘Another mass shooting in America’: Oregon killings a grim familiarity for US’ and the article included Obama’s angry speech.

The telegraph reported, Oregon shooting: Barack Obama in impassioned call for ‘common sense’ gun laws
President visibly moved and angry after yet another mass shooting, stating ‘our thoughts and prayers are not enough’

Dana Loesch in an interview with Megyn Kelly Thursday evening said, Gun-free zones are criminal protection areas”. Isn’t that simply logic?

She pointed out that we have very little information. Where did the killer get the guns, for example?

Mr. Obama rarely lets facts get in the way.


1. While the United States has the most fatalities from mass shootings in the 34 member states of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development because of our large population, Norway (recall the Anders Breivik massacre), Finland, Slovakia, Israel, and Switzerland have double the ratio, ijReview reported.

The top 5 countries for mass shootings per capita all have “restrictive” gun policies.

2. Pew Research has reported that gun homicides are down 49% since 1993.

3. The National Review Online published an article in 2010 on the relationship between gun control and mass murders in Europe and America. It explored the misperception that mass murder is an exclusively American phenomenon. The author is John Lott, well known author of More Guns, Less Crime.

There are some very interesting facts:

“all the multiple-victim public shootings in Western Europe have occurred in places where civilians are not permitted to carry guns. The same is true in the United States: All the public shootings in which more than three people have been killed have occurred in places where civilians may not legally bring guns.”

4. The FBI crime statistics for 2011, the last year ‘weapons used’ was reported that we could find, show that while 323 murders were committed with a rifle, 496 murders were committed with hammers and clubs. Shall we ban hammers and clubs? They are more dangerous than rifles.

Nearly twice as many people are killed by hands and fists each year than are killed by murderers who use shotguns. People are 60 percent more likely to die from a knife or sharp instrument than rifles and shotguns combined.

As homicides with guns have gone down, the data also shows that the amount of people killed by hammers, clubs and other blunt instruments continues to rise each year though not to the level of gun deaths yet.

5. As the threat of losing the right to gun ownership looms, people are racing to buy them. The FBI recorded 2.78 million background checks in December 2012 surpassing the 2.01 million checks in November by 39 percent. This is up 49 percent since December 2011 when 1.86 million checks were recorded by the FBI.

Prior to the latest call for gun bans, the share of U.S. households with a gun was falling and has been falling for decades, from 54 percent in 1977 to 32 percent in 2010, according to the University of Chicago’s General Social Survey. There are currently 307 million legal guns in our country.

Gun dealers call the Obama administration’s calls for broad gun control measures a gun-buying stimulus.

6. From 1980 – 2008, males were 77% of the homicide victims and 90% of the offenders. Men were also the victims over females by a 3 to 1 ratio. Men offend at a rate 9 times higher than females. Given this stat, men should be banned, not guns – following leftist logic.

7. Many of the homicides in cities are gang and drug related. From 1980 – 2008, the number of homicides involving gang violence had quadruped since 1980. During the same time period, gun involvement in gang-related homicides increased from 73 percent to 92 percent. It seems that a gun ban will not affect this since gangs generally use illegal guns. The illegal gun trade is alive and well.

Twenty-five percent of the gang-related homicides were under 18 years. Youth under 18 were also 19% of persons killed by family members and 18 percent of persons killed during a sex-related crime.

8. In 2008, 59% of young child homicide victims were killed by a parent, 10% were killed by some other family member and 30% were murdered by a friend or acquaintance. This points to a serious cultural problem and the choice of weapon seems almost irrelevant when the real issue is violent, perverse behavior resulting from mental defect or drug abuse.

9. Would banning guns affect the violence in our society?

During the years in which the D.C. handgun ban and trigger lock law was in effect, the Washington, D.C. murder rate averaged 73% higher than it was at the outset of the law, while the U.S. murder rate averaged 11% lower.



The leftist websites are distorting the facts. If they have something they want to prove, they conduct a study with predetermined results to back it up.

If we take too many gun rights away from legal gun owners, we will have succeeded in limiting the right of the people to protect themselves. We will not have addressed gangs, poverty, poor education and career training, child abuse, drugs, mental illness, or the illegal gun trade.

National Review Online also asked the question Friday – is the media encouraging mass shootings by giving them the publicity they crave?

The solution is to take guns away from crazy leftists who are overwhelmingly gang members.

Obama water gun tweet





    April 13, 2009

    It is a common fantasy that gun bans make society safer. In 2002 — five years after enacting its gun ban — the Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged there is no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime. In fact, the percent of murders committed with a firearm was the highest it had ever been in 2006 (16.3 percent), says the D.C. Examiner.

    Even Australia’s Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime:
    •In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
    •Sexual assault — Australia’s equivalent term for rape — increased 29.9 percent.
    •Overall, Australia’s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.

    Moreover, Australia and the United States — where no gun-ban exists — both experienced similar decreases in murder rates:
    •Between 1995 and 2007, Australia saw a 31.9 percent decrease; without a gun ban, America’s rate dropped 31.7 percent.
    •During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
    •Sexual assault — Australia’s equivalent term for rape — increased 29.9 percent.
    •Overall, Australia’s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
    •At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8 percent: rape dropped 19.2 percent; robbery decreased 33.2 percent; aggravated assault dropped 32.2 percent.
    •Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.

    While this doesn’t prove that more guns would impact crime rates, it does prove that gun control is a flawed policy. Furthermore, this highlights the most important point: gun banners promote failed policy regardless of the consequences to the people who must live with them, says the Examiner.

    Source: Howard Nemerov, “Australia experiencing more violent crime despite gun ban,” Free Republic, April 9, 2009.
    – See more at: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=17847#sthash.hBwhPjVr.dpuf

    • If you took two minutes to research the figures you’re posting, you’ll realise that they are not comparisons of per-capita rate. Whoever originally wrote that post of yours took the raw figures from here: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/facts/1-20/2013/1_recorded.html

      They are a comparison of the raw crime stats, and do not take into account the fact that Australia’s population rose by 22% in that decade. Assault was up, but not by as much as your stats show. Sexual assault is roughly average, and robbery was down.

Leave a Reply