A Simple Question for Nations & Pols Afraid to Confront Iran’s Quest For Nukes

3
401

We’d like to offer a simple but extremely critical question for all those who are, when it comes to Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, shuffling towards appeasement.

Whether you’re congenitally conciliatory Europeans, Trump-hating Democrats, anti-Trump Republicans,  Libertarians, genuine believers in all war being bad, or those who only protest war when it serves their political purpose, we are asking this:

Given the nervous, itchy fingered Iranian military’s use of surface to air missiles to blow up a commercial airliner, killing 176 innocents including 100 of their own; would you really want this dangerous, rogue outlier nation to have intercontinental ballistic missiles armed with nuclear war heads?

Actually, if possible, it might be even more informative to by-pass the usual pearl-clutching, international, intellectuals and ask the same question of anonymous Iranians.  With the latest misuse of relatively small missiles resulting in a greatly disproportionate death of friends and neighbors, why would they want to risk Armageddon at the hands of their own crazy, incompetent leaders?

Watching recent demonstrations against the Ayatollah, it would be better if the world’s highbrow appeasers took a deep breath, laid aside their pearls, and rallied behind those courageous Iranians.

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg
5 years ago

Enough of this crap, “Trump killed the Iranian general”, as if he was just some mild-mannered person that warranted to live in peace. and Fox is just as bad.

Greg
5 years ago

How soon do we see something as this said by the US media conglomerates. This is huge.

https://twitter.com/FarnazML64/status/1216601797004951553

Greg
5 years ago

Some of the arguments today sound similar to arguments of the old radio show, The Fifth Horseman series. Just as the producers of that time were pacifist in their portrayal, in fear of possibilities, so to today we have those who assume a certain, definite outcome. Time and again, those who profess to have the expertise in these affairs have been demonstrably Wrong. As Senator Cotton pointed out; The past Presidents decided against moving the US Embassy in Israel due to “experts”. When it Was done, the dire predictions never came to pass. It was those Same “experts” that said removing Saddam would have great beneficial results. And once again the experts seem to be wrong on so many things. Maybe it’s time to “study Why” the experts are so consistent in their failures.