Update at the end
A federal judge on Friday directed the White House to restore the press credentials of Jim Acosta of CNN temporarily. It is a temporary ruling.
Abusive Acosta lost his pass after he wouldn’t relinquish the mic and chopped at the arm of the intern trying to take it from him. His questions are always meant to embarrass the President.
The revocation of the press badge that grants access to the White House grounds became a test case for journalists who say the President can’t withhold privileges from this reporter.
The ruling, from Judge Timothy J. Kelly of Federal District Court in Washington, was viewed as a victory for journalism and a timely reminder of press freedoms that advocates say have recently come under threat.
CNN had argued that Mr. Acosta’s free speech and due process rights were violated, warning that a president should not be allowed to pick and choose who reports on him.
The administration contended that presidents enjoy broad discretion to bar journalists from the White House and that Mr. Acosta’s barbed questioning and refusal to yield his microphone was boorish and disrespectful.
Judge Kelly’s decision came in response to CNN’s request for an emergency order restoring Mr. Acosta’s credential.
-
The Importance of Prayer: How a Christian Gold Company Stands Out by Defending Americans’ Retirement
Other legal issues raised by the suit, CNN v. Donald J. Trump, which the network filed this week, were expected to be addressed in subsequent hearings.
The case, CNN v. Donald J. Trump, is being used to say the President’s White House is dysfunctional. If you have watched the pressers, the press is dysfunctional and abusive.
Hopefully, the President will not call on him or rotate seats so he’s in the back at times.
Statement from CNN and @Acosta on today’s ruling: “We are gratified with this result and we look forward to a full resolution in the coming days. Our sincere thanks to all who have supported not just CNN, but a free, strong and independent American press.”
— CNN Communications (@CNNPR) November 16, 2018
UPDATE
Not everyone agrees with the decision.
Bad ruling because it rejects the argument that standards of personal conduct should be respected on federal property. If the White House appeals, I believe it will prevail in the Supreme Court. https://t.co/11A49QqnO1
— Bill O’Reilly (@BillOReilly) November 16, 2018
Next move is Acosta’s. Let’s see if he learned anything from this. Will he keep giving his personal opinions? Will he keep asking four questions without yielding the mic? https://t.co/drhbertokF
— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) November 16, 2018
This was a case of “due process”. How pathetic is a “Justice” system that gives a “news” organization due process but when it comes to civil asset forfeiture there is NO due process. So long as one is in a “protected” class all is well. I have absolutely no faith or confidence in our system justice, if one wants to call it that.
rule number one in any such gathering… never give the person asking questions the mic… an intern should hold it at ALL times. Period.
also, just don’t call on Jim or April. Period.
Did Obama once say to the press, “This is My House”.
The Administration doesn’t determine the seating arrangement. It is set by the White House Correspondents Assoc. Recently it was somewhat modified.
Unfortunately there was precedent in the DC Circuit court that had to be considered, which is ‘due process’ in the revocation, according to previous case law. The White House can follow its process and then revoke the pass once again and then Acosta would have little recourse.
What is disgusting, this is the same CNN that lobbied heavily to get Infowars off all platforms and domains and removing their payment processors. It is the same outfit that “threatened” an individual for a “meme”. It is the same outfit that harassed an elderly woman calling her essentially a “Russian agent”. It would be interesting to see a class action lawsuit Against CNN for all this.
In the meantime the President should forthwith cancel all events, press conferences etc with the press and any events with only a pool reporter.
Helpful comment with the background about precedent. And totally agree with you about CNN’s hypocrisy.
I’d like to see a new WH policy on press briefings; If a ‘journalist’ can’t behave like an adult, they get a diaper.