The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons says Hydroxychloroquine helps 91% of their coronavirus patients. They don’t want to wait for controlled trials. The organization wrote a letter to Arizona Governor Doug Ducey urging wider use of the drug to treat COVID.
According to the organization, scientific data, the research, the science shows on 2,333 coronavirus patients with the virus, the drug helped 91% of them recover.
The data was a compilation from doctors including Dr. Mehmet Oz.
Dr. Fauci just won’t encourage the use of the drug, despite its 100-year-old history. We have nothing else except remdesivir which the powers that be also won’t release for wide use.
Hydroxychloroquine can cause heart arrhythmias but shouldn’t doctors monitor that and not politicians.
One small and flawed VA study is continually used to say it killed more veterans than saved. However, the drug was mostly given to people near-death and the malaria/arthritis drug has to be used early on. There were other flaws and the study needs to be mostly dismissed. We know it shouldn’t be given to people in the end-stages.
President Trump hailed the drug as a ‘game-changer’ and since then, the media and Democrat politicians have made it nearly impossible to use it.
Dr. Fauci is totally negative about everything. Yesterday, he sounded like sports can’t come back this year but claimed today in a conversation with Fox News that people are reading him wrong. Perhaps Tony doesn’t realize how he comes off — he’s doom and gloom.
The letter echoes sentiments expressed by the president: “What do you have to lose?” President Trump asked of coronavirus patients while extolling the promise of hydroxychloroquine during a recent press briefing.
“I’m not looking at it one way or another. But we want to get out of this. If it does work, it would be a shame if we didn’t do it early.
“What do I know? I’m not a doctor, but I have common sense. The FDA feels good about it, as you know they approved it.”
The FDA gave emergency use authorization for doctors to prescribe hydroxychloroquine to some coronavirus patients and they did the same with remdesivir.
When asked if there was evidence that hydroxychloroquine works to treat coronavirus, Dr. Fauci said, “No. The answer is no,” because he gives no credence whatsoever to anecdotal evidence, just clinical trials.
The AAPS letter mostly cites anecdotal studies.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Isn’t is odd the entire world is taking the opposite route of Fauci.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJYSsJN431I
Utter BS. FAUCI’s NIH 2005 study of chloroquine indicated the drug WORKS vs corona viruses
Remdesivir is a NEW EXPENSIVE drug tested vs HIV. FAUCI pushing the new expensive one for his Dem stock holder friends.
Hydroxychloroquine has remarkably FEW side effects. Guarantee the Z pack antibiotic has more potential side effects.
It’s the same with Fauci hyping the vaccine trials. According to Fauci it must be a sure thing, inevitable. History suggests this is not the case. The one doctor, and representative, rattled off about four different vaccines that never succeeded. Fauci seems aligned with Bill Gates who admitted he is an “expert” on vaccines and therapy. Suspicions are growing against both of these two.
At the briefing Fauci threw out a bunch of numbers that make it sound quite effective using Remdesivir. But the details say otherwise. His “30%” seemingly refers to 11 days for Remdesivir while 15 for “nothing”. This is the way I understand it. I would conclude taking a drug with a mere 4 day result over Nothing isn’t much of a benefit. This was said to be a fairly large study. From what I understand from the French study, it was larger and had “better” results with Hydroxychloroquine. Fauci “should” have had both drugs used for test results.
I find it quite fishy that Fauci only wants to recommend a one-source drug that is costly over a cheap multi-source drug. What incentives does Fauci have with such a rigid stance when he was stating the opposite only a few years ago. It the same with his rigidness on any opening up of the economy. Makes a person wonder if he isn’t an agent of China. It Was His agency that sent money to that Wuhan lab, which is why we are here.
I need white coats and quotes around the term experts. Isn’t it too late now that tens of millions are dead from Black Plague 2.0…oh wait a minute.