Biden-Appointed Judge Orders Administration to Continue NIH Grants

4
66

A federal judge in Massachusetts ruled tonight that the National Institutes of Health must continue to fund research grants and comply with earlier agreements. The Trump administration had sought to cut the funding, and 22 states sued to restore the funding.

A Biden-appointed federal judge in Massachusetts, Angel Kelley, today blocked an attempt by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to cut some $4 billion annually that goes to universities to cover the cost of supporting research on their campuses. The preliminary injunction replaces a temporary restraining order issued 3 days after NIH announced on 7 February it was reducing the “indirect cost rate” paid on an NIH grant to a flat 15%, down from 50% or higher at many institutions.

She claimed the usual. In granting the injunction, U.S. District Court Judge Angel Kelley wrote that NIH likely violated federal law in abruptly withdrawing the funding and failed “to contemplate the risk to human life as research and clinical trials are suspended in response” or “the life, careers, and advancement that will be lost as these budgets are indiscriminately slashed.”

The government is “enjoined from taking any steps to implement, apply, or enforce” the new NIH policy “until further orders [are] issued by this Court,” Kelley wrote.

Kelley’s 76-page opinion agrees with the entire argument of the 22 leftist states.

Additionally, NiH is lying to evade DOGE and continue doling out grants not in line with the administrations orders.

We might as well all go home. Judges run the country and our so-called conservative Supreme Court and Congress won’t do a thing.

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
1 month ago

All these rulings include the vaguest of language.
likely violated federal law”
likely violated the US Constitution”

DON’T YOU KNOW? ISN’T THAT THE POINT OF COURT TO FIND OUT SPECIFICS AND DOCUMENT THEM IN YOUR RULING?

Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

I guess I’ll go into my bank and say “I likely have a million dollars in my account – I want to withdraw it.”

In marxist judicial world, I’d get handed a million dollars.

Last edited 1 month ago by Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Its likely, Joe Biden committed pedophilia when he showered with 11 yo Ashley

Why don’t they arrest Joe and have this same judge rule on what he did?

Last edited 1 month ago by Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

The ‘tail’, judges(?), are wagging the dog….the PEOPLE….