The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the parents of a Mexican teenager who was shot dead over the border by a Border Patrol agent cannot sue in U.S. courts.
The parents argued that the Border Patrol used excessive force.
Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca was shot and killed by Border Patrol Agent Jesus Mesa Jr., in 2010. Mesa was on U.S. soil in Texas when he fired the fatal shot at the 15-year-old, 60 ft. away on the southern side of the border in Ciudad Juarez.
Mesa said there was a group of suspected illegal immigrants in a culvert that runs along the border who were throwing rocks at him.
Justice Samuel Alito cited strong border security and international relations issues in writing for the court, Roll Call reported.
“Since regulating the conduct of agents at the border unquestionably has national security implications, the risk of undermining border security provides reasons to hesitate” about allowing the parents to sue in American courts, Alito wrote.
Alito also noted that the Justice Department did not charge Mesa, having concluded that he had not violated Customs and Border Protection policy or training.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the liberal jurists, disagreed. She said that the parents’ lawsuit does not endanger border security or U.S. foreign policy.
Ginsburg said the teen’s exact location in the culvert when he was shot “should not matter one whit” when the United States has jurisdiction to govern a Border Patrol agent’s conduct in this country, according to Roll Call.
“It scarcely makes sense for a remedy trained on deterring rogue officer conduct to turn upon a happenstance subsequent to the conduct — a bullet landing in one half of a culvert, not the other,” she wrote.
The leftists believe everyone in the U.S. has rights over Americans. Guereca had a history of human smuggling and was a convicted juvenile offender.
His parents tried to say he was an ‘A’ student who was simply playing with his friends.
Lee Gelernt, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union who argued the case, disagreed with the ruling, NBC News reported.
“The gravity of this ruling could not be clearer given the Trump administration”s militarized rhetoric and policies targeting people at the border. Border agents should not have immunity to fatally shoot Mexican teenagers on the other side of the border fence,” Gelernt said. “The Constitution does not stop at the border.”
It’s a big Loss for the hard-left and the ACLU that wants to make this a regular thing. If activist judges can make this legal, Border Patrol will have their hands tied.
The media, especially the AP are very distressed that the U.S. Border Patrol won this case.
The family wanted $25 million. It also would have eliminated self-defense for border agents.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
would like to know who voted for !!! they are some real idiots!! the illegals know when they cross the border that they are subject to a prisoner status. they are fugitives until apprehended when they step foot onto american soil!! they give up everything when they cross illegally!!
great job, illegal aliens should not be able to sue in US
Border Patrol Agent Jesus Mesa had every right to shoot any foreign national who crosses the border with demonstrated intentions to commit violence against himself as a US agent. You can bet your last dollar that if a US teen decided it would be cool to cross the border and throw rocks at a Mexican Federali, Mexican authorities wouldn’t hesitate to use the same deadly force. The Supreme Court’s ruling sided with national sovereignty and should be applauded.
Remember when the People’s Champion said you will grow tired of all this winning.
They shouldn’t be allowed to sue under the 11th Amendment.