According to John Solomon on ‘Hannity’ Wednesday evening, former FBI Director Jim Comey was recommended for prosecution by the Inspector General Michael Horowitz but the Attorney General has declined.
Prosecutors found the IG’s findings compelling but decided not to bring charges because they did not believe they had enough evidence of Comey’s intent to violate the law, according to multiple sources.
Ironically, Comey’s decision not to charge Clinton for violating the Espionage Act for mishandling classified information on her email server mirrors the same rationale that Barr’s DOJ applied in declining prosecution of him: a lack of evidence of intent.
Comey took FBI files, brought them home, and leaked them. He took the files to his home after he was fired which is a violation of the President’s rights.
There are reports that there are more serious charges possibly coming regarding lying and FISA abuse.
There will also be a very damning IG report on Jim Comey.
The more important thing to watch is the ongoing investigation. Comey remains under tight scrutiny over the FISA probe, a more serious crime.
For now, Comey gets off. The case would have been tried in New York, which is very corrupt.
-
The Importance of Prayer: How a Christian Gold Company Stands Out by Defending Americans’ Retirement
It’s a very bad sign that Barr is not aggressive. He is allowing the IG to add delays during a national emergency, though it is far past time for aggressive legal action.
since when did you have to “INTEND” to commit a crime? when your the top Law official in the Country you commit a crime or you don’t simple and intent has nothing to do with it!
this is kinda like I did not intend to use a machete on that mans skull??? WTH
What the heck??? They are STILL getting away “scot free”…Does being a seditious, traitorous,lying and conniving lowlife with a democrat voters card automatically exempt one from censure???