Brennan Called Trump “Treasonous” But He Didn’t Mean “Treasonous”

14
4094

Remember when the former CIA director John Brennan said the President meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki was treasonous? He was very specific and he clearly meant the meeting was “treasonous” and the President was a traitor.

It was an imbecilic comment for a former CIA director to make when it would in no way met the constitutional definition.

Just the same, people took it seriously with 216,000 ‘liking’ it and nearly 100,000 retweeting it, sending fake news around the world.

Brennan tweeted about the so-called “treason” on July 16 of this year.

“Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of “high crimes & misdemeanors,” he wrote, “It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???”

That seems rather clear. Brennan said the meeting was “treasonous” and exceeded the threshold of “high crimes & misdemeanors”.

Well, as it turns out, he didn’t mean treasonous meant treasonous although that’s the term he used.

It was a very reckless thing for Brennan to say and now he nonchalantly admits it wasn’t treasonous. At the same time, he is denying he said it. Brennan’s lying has gone to new heights with this one, but no one should be surprised that the man who lied to Congress under oath also lies about what he said when he was on the record and we have instant replay.

This is who the Resistance is. This is the Democrat Party today. It’s also a good example of what you can expect from MSNBC. He is their highly-paid commentator.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Buzz
Guest
Buzz
5 years ago

It all depends on what the meaning of “is” is.

sam dennis
Guest
sam dennis
5 years ago

Brennan was using his Security Clearance ‘access’ as a chip in his continual tirade of false innuendo against Trump in order to disrupt and destroy an elected Administration. It gave him some credibility with the LEFT. Without that particular cashe Brennan has nothing going for him given his record of lying to Congress.

bydesign001
Guest
bydesign001
5 years ago

Oh let me guess, on the morning of November 9, 2016 after the Associated Press called the Presidential election, the Muslim convert (or so it seems) found himself “triggered” after which he became a tad erratic, feeling of which has lasted for the past 600+ days?

Well then, it’s a damned good thing that POTUS rescinded Brennan’s security clearance.

JulianusRex
Guest
JulianusRex
5 years ago

Brennan has committed felonies. Where is Sessions? (What a stupid question for me to ask!)

Felina Erse
Guest
Felina Erse
5 years ago

President Trump called Brennan’s bluff and Brennan’s many threats did not intimidate our President. Brennan would like to change the history of Brennan failures during his tenure of CIA Director. Fortunately, the President has facts on Brennan’s many failures and will continue exposing Brennan for Brennan’s failures.