Busted! Experts Say Clinton Foundation Acted as a “Foreign Agent”

4
1229

The Clintons might still have to answer for their corrupt behavior. Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch won’t let it go, doing the job Congress and the DoJ should do.

On Friday, Hillary Clinton answered two questions posed by Judicial watch under oath and in writing. Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered her to answer the questions about her emails. She claims in her answers that she used clintonemail.com as a “convenience” and basically knows nothing about who and why.

This past week, experts testified about the Clinton Foundation

According to two, the Clinton Foundation should have never been a registered non-profit and should have been viewed as a foreign agent.

This testimony was given before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which was convened by Rep. Mark Meadows.

Investigative journalist Sarah Carter reports:

The Clinton Foundation operated as a foreign agent ‘early in its life’ and ‘throughout its existence’ and did not operate as a 501c3 charitable foundation as required by its and is not entitled to its status as a nonprofit, alleged two highly qualified forensic investigators, accompanied by three other investigators, said in explosive testimony Thursday to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Over 6,000 documents on the Clinton Foundation were turned over to the FBI and they are being reviewed. At the same time, forensic experts testified that the Clinton Foundation was a clearinghouse for foreign graft.

More from Carter’s report:

[Witness John] Moynihan stated “Foreign agent,” as he began to read from a long list of violations discovered during the course of their investigation.

The Clinton Foundation “began acting as an agent of foreign governments ‘early in its life’ and throughout its existence. As such, the foundation should’ve registered under FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act),” he said. “Ultimately, the Foundation and its auditors conceded in formal submissions that it did operate as a (foreign) agent, therefore the foundation is not entitled to its 501c3 tax-exempt privileges as outlined in IRS 170 (c)2.”

The Uranium One scandal suggests just such an illicit relationship WITH RUSSIA.

CLIPS FROM THE HEARING
THE FULL HEARING

 


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ronald Gene Nelson
Guest
Ronald Gene Nelson
4 years ago

And….wait…nothing will be done. Our country is doomed.

Terry Schuck
Guest
Terry Schuck
4 years ago

Glad you are making mention of it. Regrettably, nothing will come of it.

The vipers and termites in the DOJ AND the IRS have no will and the previous stuff, e. g. Comey’s excrement sandwich, has tainted all of it.

Rocketman
Guest
Rocketman
4 years ago

Isn’t it interesting that just about the time that the Democrats retake the house they’ll be asked to investigate the Clinton “pay for play” scheme? Think that this will get buried under the rug like Whitewater, Mena Ark. airport scandal and all of the hundreds of other times when nothing was done? I sure do!

Greg
Guest
Greg
4 years ago

I wasn’t too impressed with Meadows towards the end. He sounded more like Mueller wanting “all” the documents. We’ve already seen all these “Republican” committees haul one person after another on this ridiculous Russian scandal. I no longer have much faith in Either party. No one in this party gave a damn about conservative censorship UNTIL they were included. And then, they had the top man from Google and what was Goodlatte concerned about. How much ads were costing him on Google. They are all self-absorbed and self-interested.

It appears we have a better understanding why Clinton, and co-conspirators, decided to formulate the Russia strategy. According to Steele’s testimony he was hired by Perkins Coie to obtain information necessary for legal advice of the potential impact of Russian involvement, and the “legal validity” of the outcome. The DNC and Hillary could consider steps they would be legally entitled to in order to challenge the validity of the outcome of the election.

It has been perplexing when Hillary supporters seem to believe they could overturn the election and reverse the outcome. Many seemed to believe it was just the rantings of idiots who didn’t understand the system. Well now, maybe they were privy to this information. This is the first I’ve read on it and maybe that is still the hope and goal, and why it has continued, and will continue.