California, Where 70% of Water Washes Out to Sea During a Drought


U.N. Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. INVENTORY AND CONTROL. ~ Rosa Koire, Democrats Against Agenda 21

The U.N. Agenda 21 is alive and well despite the insistence of those implementing it that it’s a conspiracy theory. Their tentacles are everywhere through their ICLEI local government manipulation projects and partnerships with various NGOs.

It’s not an overt takeover by the U.N. It’s just that their vision and the vision of Leftists in America are the same. Their goals are the same as are their methods of reaching those goals.

There is an almost telepathic relationship between leftists in America and the U.N. The U.S. is a major funder of the U.N. climate research; redistributes U.S. tax dollars to green projects throughout the world via the U.N.; and supports U.N. land, air and water restrictions based on assumed climate changes derived from computer models. 

The EPA is following the model of the U.N. agenda and, most recently, is planning a takeover of all water in the United States. The EPA – unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats – will be able to control all water down to the ditches on personal property though they claim they won’t exercise that authority.

California has been a battleground but with so many liberals and leftists in the state, there’s not much of a battle going on.

Rosa Koire, a Democratic activist is working to save individual rights over the land in California. She asks on her website, “Have you wondered where these terms ‘sustainability’ and ‘smart growth’ and ‘high density urban mixed use development’ came from?”

Her answer in part:

The U.N. has “very specific land use policies that they would like to see implemented in every city, county, state and nation.  The specific plan is called United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, which has its basis in Communitarianism.  By now, most Americans have heard of sustainable development but are largely unaware of Agenda 21.”

“In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners.  It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control.  Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body.  Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation.  Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.”

There is a symbiotic relationship between leftists in the U.S. and U.N. socialists and communists who use global warming to institute an extreme agenda that stalls progress and could one day end private land ownership or, in the least, end private control over land.

Just because it is happening gradually, doesn’t mean it isn’t.


Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina recently pointed to the problems of environmental extremism in California. I’ve already posted this but it’s worth reposting.

Fiorina blames California’s water crisis on “liberal environmentalists” who are “willing to sacrifice other people’s lives and livelihoods at the altar of their ideology.”

California Gov. Jerry Brown announced a crackdown on water usage by residents and businesses to deal with water usage during the drought. He didn’t include the agriculture industry which accounts for 80% of the human water usage, however. He can’t but what he is doing means little. A mere 25% less water usage by 20% of the users is only enough to make people feel uncomfortable and accept the false doctrine espoused by climate exaggerators.

The sad thing is it is a self-induced crisis by environmentalist leftists.

This could have been avoided with different policies presidential aspirant Carly Fiorina told Glenn Beck on his radio show.

“California is a classic case of liberals being willing to sacrifice other people’s lives and livelihoods at the altar of their ideology. It is a tragedy,” Ms. Fiorina said.

“Despite the fact that California has suffered from droughts for millennia, liberal environmentalists have prevented the building of a single new reservoir or a single new water conveyance system over decades during a period in which California’s population has doubled.”

Fiorina said that because of this, 70 percent of California’s rainfall “washes out to sea” year after year.

“How is it possible that we don’t hear that story on the news at all?” Beck asked.

“Isn’t that interesting?” Fiorina responded. “It is a man-made disaster. California is a classic case of liberals being willing to sacrifice other people’s lives and livelihoods at the altar of their ideology. It is a tragedy.”

Fiorina said Congress has the power to ease some of the water restrictions for farmers, but the restrictions remain in place to protect certain forms of wildlife.

“In California, fish and frogs and flies are really important — far more important apparently than the 40 percent unemployment rate in certain parts of central valley,” Fiorina said. “So the Senate and the president could waive some of those water restrictions. They have been asked to do so, and they have refused to do so.”


“Government has grown so huge, so powerful, so costly, so complex, it is literally crushing the life out of this country,” Fiorina responded. “It is crushing small and family-owned businesses, which are the economic engine of our nation. It is crushing possibilities out of people’s lives by entangling them in a web of dependence from which they cannot escape. The weight, the cost and the power of government are literally crushing the potential of the nation.”

“We must, absolutely must, get government under control, which means reducing its size and its power and its complexity in really fundamental ways,” Fiorina continued. “And that is why I am seriously considering running for president, and will make a final decision over the next month or so. I have come to the point of view that too many politicians have been captured in this system for too long, and they no longer see what needs to be done.”

Will we all keep falling in line with the globalist vision?

In 1995, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former U.S. National Security Adviser said, “We cannot leap into world government in one quick step … [T]he precondition for eventual globalization – genuine globalization – is progressive regionalization. Because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units.” 

That is the guiding principle behind ICLEI. While California has been a major battleground because of its liberalism, the forces are visible in every state in the union. Common Core curricula, which is based on the U.N. Core curricula, teaches an extremist version of global warming to ensure generations of new believers. Land is being taken or controlled in every state.

California is a disaster thanks in part to their modeling of the U.N. movement but it’s only just the beginning. The movement, whether it’s attributed to a U.N. takeover or not, is happening. It is a social engineering project which takes away individuality and mandates a singular order to things. It is out-of-control  big government, collectivism – Fascism. It kills progress because progress stems from individual ingenuity and one needs individual freedom for that to happen.

Moonbeam Jerry Brown told Martha Radditz on This Week that he’s going to fine people $500 a day if they shower too long.

Brown said, “This executive order is done under emergency power. It has the force of law. Very unusual. It’s requiring action and changes in behavior from the Oregon border all the way to the Mexican border. It affects lawns. It affects people’s — how long they stay in the shower. How businesses use water.”

The districts can to to court, issue cease and desist orders. “The enforcement mechanism is powerful. In a drought of this magnitude, you have to change that behavior and you have to change it substantially.”

Meanwhile 70% of the water is rushing out to sea.