Christine Blasey’s Therapist Notes Don’t Back Up Her Story

19

Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser came forward, she says, because she feels it’s her “civic responsibility.”

“These are all the ills that I was trying to avoid,” Ford told the Washington Post. “Now I feel like my civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and my terror about retaliation.”

Judge Kavanaugh has since issued two statements denying the allegations.

THE EVIDENCE

Christine Blasey-Ford’s claim against Judge Brett Kavanaugh includes “evidence”. The evidence does not stand up under scrutiny. She claims she never mentioned the alleged assault by the Judge until 2012 when she and her husband went into couples’ therapy.

There are therapist notes from that time to prove the allegation, only they don’t.

Ford reported being attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society.”

“The notes don’t name Kavanaugh, and they say four boys were involved, not two. Ford told the Post this was the therapist’s error — there were four boys at the party, she said, but only two in the room,” VOX reported.

Kavanaugh is NOT named and she said FOUR boys were involved.

That doesn’t change the fact that the notes do not prove what she claims they prove.

Her husband claims she mentioned Kavanaugh’s name and her #MeToo lawyer said she passed her polygraph test.

Ford says she doesn’t remember many details of the event, such as how she got home, the exact year it took place, or how the gathering was put together.

That’s convenient!

Her family was involved with his family on foreclosure(s), she’s a Democrat who contributes to Democrat causes, and she scrubbed her online presence thoroughly. [Update: the foreclosure story has been disputed here.]

The DNC president Tom Perez is demanding an FBI probe. This is the same Tom Perez who didn’t say a word about sexual abuse allegations against Keith Ellison.

Democrats are also calling for a delay of the confirmation. This is what they have promised their hard-left base all along and they promised to do it at all costs.

RELATED STORY

Kavanaugh Wants to Testify, Dems Say “Delay”

19 COMMENTS

  1. Who allows their family home to be foreclosed on by a judge whose son sexually assaulted their daughter without saying a word.

    • You are so right! This proves beyond a doubt how far the dems will disgrace themselves to ruin a person’s reputation. The dem party is a party run by GEORGE SOROS & Barack Obama. DEPORT THE B*stard – hand him over to the Russians or Israelis!

      1

  2. Liars should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Slander is a serious crime. Additionally, to discourage future fake Me Too accusations, Judge Kavanaugh should sue Christine Blasey for defamation for millions. That will make whatever the DNC paid her to fabricate her attack story, non-profitable.

  3. Liars should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Slander is a serious crime. Additionally, to discourage future fake Me Too accusations, Judge Kavanaugh should sue Christine Blasey for defamation for millions, and render what the DNC paid her to fabricate this story, non-profitable.

  4. That foreclosure story may not be all it’s cracked up to be. Apparently the family refinanced the loan so the outcome isn’t what may be imagined.

  5. If this was gathered by “repressed memories” then a polygraph is utter meaningless. All a polygraph tells us is the person “believes” the answer to be accurate. It wouldn’t be unusual for a repressed memory to be inaccurate. Does anyone remember the uproar over the McMartin preschool hysteria which was finally revealed to be false memories and had been “facilitated” by the interviewer.

    It’s even more suspicious that Feinstein is refusing to cooperate with Grassley in investigating the matter. Clearly the Democrats are wanting to keep the Court in a 4 to 4 tie on important votes.

  6. If this happened, she would remember everything. Take it from me – seventy years ago someone tried to jump me. I remember the year, the street the house and policeman that helped me, the color of the man’s jacket, his unbuckled galoshes. You don’t forget an experience like that.

  7. Assume Kavanaugh was guilty of a youthful indiscretion as alledged. As a society we claim to beleive in redemption and growth of awareness in out relations between genders. Hasn’t Kavanaugh demonstrated his awareness of women’s rights through his demonstrated promotion of women in the workplace throughout his career?

  8. OK as for the debunking. Not exactly true. Here’s what happened.
    Kavanuaghs mother did preside over the case, she did originally rule against them but they were able to get another loan and re-mortgage the home and his mother pulled her original judgment.

    So it stands that the accuser could still hold a grudge against his mother for her original judgment. It would at least be better for her if this was the case because the only other reason to make the claim after 35 years give or take a year since the accuser can’t remember when it happened and 6 years after she so called remembered the incident would be purely political reason making her make all women who really have been sexually abused look bad.

    Gee, her husband heard her say the name Kavanaugh. I mean really. So why didn’t the husband insist she go to the authorities? They were in canceling and obviously having marital problems. You’d think he would want her to speak up and help the marriage.

    Lets also not forget that it seems this all happened while they were underage. There’s a reason why those under the age of 18 are considered minors and anything they do up until their 18th birthday is all but erased from their record. This is because most minors do stupid things and our society has made a determination that what we do as minors it shouldn’t be held against after we become adults. So where are all Kavanaughs victims since he became of age.

    If we now set precedence to judge people by what they may of did in grade school I doubt very much we’ll ever have a top official in office ever again because I’m sure everyone has done something while in grade school which will offend someone in today’s society today.

  9. This gal is a liar. She remembers Kavanaugh attacking her but not what year, where, who was there, she was drunk and has no idea if anything happened to her. What a joke the Demorats put her up to this to stop the vote. Stupid move but then they are not very smart.

  10. This gal is a liar. She remembers Kavanaugh attacking her but not what year, where, who was there, she was drunk and has no idea if anything happened to her. What a joke the Demorats put her up to this to stop the vote. Stupid move but then they are not very smart.

  11. This gal is a liar. She remembers Kavanaugh attacking her but not what year, where, who was there, she was drunk and has no idea if anything happened to her. What a joke the Demorats put her up to this to stop the vote. Stupid move but then they are not very smart.

  12. She remembers Kavanaugh attacking her but not what year, where, who was there, she was drunk and has no idea if anything happened to her. What a joke the Demorats put her up to this to stop the vote. Stupid move but then they are not very smart.

  13. Where’s the crime? “He touched her through her clothes?” For shame! Here was a drunk 15 year old girl, probably making out with the older boys until she panicked and asked to go home – whereupon someone took her home (but she doesn’t remember who). Too bad she was too drunk to remember – or is her fuzzy mind inventing details to justify the hatred her anti-Trump friends are telling her she MUST have for any Trump nominee? But the only crime in what she describes – IF IT HAPPENED – is underage drinking – whose booze was it?

Comments are closed.