Communist Cortez Says System Allowing Billionaires to Exist Is Immoral


Ta Nehisi Coates interviewed Alexandria OMao-Cortez on Martin Luther King Jr. Day and asked her, “Do we live in a moral world that allows for billionaires? Is that a moral outcome?”

Her predictable response was, “No, it’s not, it’s not. It’s not.” She made allowances for the fact that some billionaires might not be immoral people, like the two leftists, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet.”

She is talking about capitalism and calling it immoral. Cortez wants the government to decide how much wealth people are allowed to keep for themselves and what they must give to others. Her ideology is that of envy and theft.

She continued, “…I do think the system that allows billionaires to exist when there are parts of Alabama, where people are still getting ringworm because they don’t have access to public health. That is wrong. And I think it’s wrong that. I think it’s wrong that vast majority of the country does not make a living rate wage. It is wrong that you can work a hundred hours, not feed your kids. I think it’s wrong that corporations like Walmart and Amazon can get pay by the government essentially experiencing wealth transfer from the public for paying people less than a minimum wage.”

She is talking about Capitalism and declaring it evil. Her Socialist/Communist system is moral, in other words. Just as an aside, she has been appointed to the House Financial Services Committee and hates Wall Street and banks.

All Americans have access to healthcare and opportunities for success. Yet she paints a picture of starving Americans living in their cars with never-ending cases of ringworm.


In a recent poll among Democrats, they were asked if they would consider Ocommie-Cortez for President if she were old enough, and 74 percent said ‘yes’ and 17 percent said they would strongly consider her.

This is a woman who wants a 70 percent marginal tax rate and a Green New Deal that would cost trillions to do nothing for the climate.

Her Socialism and Communism is immoral because it allows billionaires to exist at the expense of EVERYBODY ELSE.



She also wants to control technology. Cortez wants moral technology that has algorithms she approves of, that aren’t sexist.

The government should determine how well people live, according to her. People who are highly successful are bad.

As Ayn Rand would say in contradiction, capitalism the only moral and practical social system — the only system consistent with man’s nature and the requirements of his life — the only one that enables each individual to reach his full, glorious potential.



The best lie of all is that she grew up in poverty in wealthy Yorktown.


  1. Capitalism’s roots are private property ownership and Liberty: this is mine; that is yours; wanna trade?

    Her ideas are nothing less than an assault on private property rights and Liberty.

  2. She has been put on the finance committee. That is like putting a chimpanzee in charge of NASA, only the chimp would have a better chance of being successful. Cortez on one dumb moron.

  3. Where is the morality of taking political opinions from a cocktail waitress that has the teeth and personality of Shrek’s donkey?

  4. “…I do think the system that allows billionaires to exist when there are parts of Alabama, where people are still getting ringworm because they don’t have access to public health. That is wrong.”

    WOW!!! Ringworm!!! Really???

    When I had ringworm, it wasn’t a National Emergency; I made my way to the drug store, bought some over-the-counter jock itch cream and it was gone in a few days.

    I guess when your only interest is to scare the less-than-thinking mind, idiotic statements, like the above, are considered logical.

    AOC is a dope!

  5. Ol’ crazy eyes doesn’t understand that all earnings over (pick your dollar amount) will be confiscated and given to someone that didn’t earn it will result in people stopping at the arbitrary amount. They will not keep earning money that they cannot keep. Let me give you an example from a business aspect. States used to tell telephone companies they couldn’t earn over X amount because they were regulated monopolies and earning over the arbitrary amount means they are greedy and any money earned over X amount would be confiscated. So if the telephone company met their earning quota by October and you needed a phone line installed in Nov or Dec, you had to wait until Jan. People do the exact same thing.

Leave a Reply