DHS has secured the return of the $59 million that FEMA employees sent to New York City for illegal aliens housing and other expenses. The media said it was sent legally from a FEMA offshoot. Guess Not!
Surprisingly, they didn’t get away with it, but President Trump does have a new ally in New York City.
DHS says it has clawed back the full $59 million FEMA gave to NYC for migrant hotels, which led to the firings of several individuals involved.
DHS spokesperson told Fox News:
“Secretary Noem has clawed back the full payment that FEMA deep state activists unilaterally gave to NYC migrant hotels. There will not be a single penny spent that goes against the interest and safety of the American people.”
The spokesperson said FEMA was “funding the Roosevelt Hotel that serves as a Tren de Aragua base of operations and was used to house Laken Riley’s killer.”
The media claimed the money wasn’t going to a luxury hotel but the Roosevelt Hotel was a luxury hotel. However, word has it that the illegal aliens are destroying it.
More from DHS spokesperson @TriciaOhio:
“FEMA was funding the Roosevelt Hotel that serves as a Tren de Aragua base of operations & was used to house Laken Riley’s killer.”https://t.co/7ezQDfGEvQ— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) February 12, 2025
Additionally, Donald Trump does have some authority to freeze or limit certain federal funding. It’s a small win, and it’s unclear what this affects.
A federal judge has ruled that President Trump possesses the authority to freeze or limit certain federal funding. pic.twitter.com/9ro4VqRT5H
— The Global Beacon (@globalbeaconn) February 12, 2025
You can comment on the article after the ads (please be polite to commenters), and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Excerpts from SCOTUS opinion on Mississippi v. Johnson. whether, in any case, the President of the United States may be required, by the process of this court, to perform a purely ministerial act under a positive law, or may be held amenable, in any case otherwise than by impeachment for crime. The single point which requires consideration is this: can… Read more »