A reader of the Sentinel made a good point that should be discussed. The government wants us to believe in a lot of anomalies and coincidences in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump while, at the same time, hiding all the information. Yesterday, Secret Service Director Cheatle refused to say if a second person was involved in the shooting. It could mean nothing since she wouldn’t answer any questions, but you’d think she’d want to dispel “conspiracy theories.” The agents sure cleaned up that site fast. I am putting this up for discussion.
“Try as I might, I cannot find any reason for hiding the number of casing other than; that number is lower than the number of shots recorded on audio tracks.
“9 shots were fired, supposedly 8 by Crooks and one by the sniper.
“If there was 8 casing by Crooks why would Cheatle be refusing to tell us ?
“obviously there are LESS than 8
“which means someone else was shooting
“the FBI and the USSS will have to fabricate some story to explain that.
“That is why they want 60 days.
“They will say 3 of the casings rolled down the sloped roof, fell in the grass and when the lawn was mowed, the casings were destroyed or some stupid story like that.
“It is obvious the 3 first shots were by the professional assassin that Cheatle knew was there.
“It is obvious that her refusing to tell us who was in charge means SHE was in charge, I do not mean she was there on site, I mean she prior to the event had gave the order to stand down and not shoot until Crooks began shooting.
“Why else is she refusing to give the most basic information ???
“It was an assassination all orchestrated by the democrat deep state, and Cheatle was in charge of making sure that event would be set up in way to make sure the professional shooter would be able to shoot Trump, and no one would stop Crooks as they needed him as the Patsy and the scapegoat.
“The plan and the order for the hit may have come from higher, Obama, Hillary, Garland, Mayorkas or even Joe and Jill Biden, but Cheatle was in charge of making sure it would work.
“It was not incompetence, the more we learn about it the less incompetence can explain it.
“It was intent, 100% intent.”
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
and I would add to that,
The assassination attempt did not happen because of incompetence.
The assassination attempt failed because of incompetence.
And concealing evidence that it was an inside job also failed miserably because of incompetence.
That is where the incompetence played a role.
And why Cheatle is refusing to tell us how many casings were found near Crooks.
“The assassination attempt did not happen because of incompetence. The assassination attempt failed because of incompetence.”
That point needs to be made again and again!
Why did Crooks fail? He was incompetent. Why was an incompetent like him likely either hired or helped to obtain what the had including explosives?
He was the sacrificial lamb who would be slaughtered so he couldn’t talk but be blamed. (No successful professional sniper assassin would have acted as stupidly as Crooks, openly walking around with a range finder, and climbing to a shooting position so openly. The snipers could not shoot him until he fired at Trump, which means that almost assuredly he was there so the real assassin could escape as an unknown factor.
The story should feature in the I.S. Clown section,
Exactly !
they needed a naive awkward guy like Crooks who was not very subtle and was noticed by a lot of people even the authorities,
to make sure once Trump would be dead everyone would say they know who the killer is, that they saw him prepare for the shooting and while everybody is focused on that Scape Goat that Sacrificial lamb,
the real assassin is laughing all the way to bank, and the people who planned it ( Biden ? Mayorkas? Cheatle ? Hillary ? Obama?) are having a BBQ laughing about it all.
But they poorly planned it, the patsy they chose was too incompetent and Cheatle is too incompetent to plan an assassination,
and they are now having trouble hiding what they did.
FBI director Chris Wray is to testify tomorrow, first question should be “how many shell casings were found where Crooks did the shooting” if Wray gives his usual ” i can’t talk about an ongoing investigation” well there is the answer, crooks wasn’t the only shooter!!!!!
And Crooks first shot was very near perfect. Given the conditions he was operating from, that is hard to believe. And the other shots didn’t come anywhere near Trump. I’ve been a shooter most of my life. That punk did not make the first shot. No. No. No!