Enough Evidence to “Arrest” Hillary! She Would Look Lovely in an Orange Jumpsuit

1
664

Tom Fitton referred to Comey’s investigation into Hillary Clinton a “sham”and said there is “more than enough evidence” to “arrest Mrs. Clinton now”. With all the evidence against Hillary, why has nothing been done? She compromised national security over and over and she lied about it under oath.

We are heading for a crisis, perhaps as early as Monday, when the Memo is released, which will be followed by the IG’s report. Then we have the Mueller investigation and a possible constitutional crisis. The one thing in all this we do know is that Hillary Clinton is guilty of endangering national security.

More than enough evidence to arrest her

“You got a Russia scandal, you’ve gotta Bahrain scandal, you gotta China scandal, you gotta Nigeria scandal…you still gotta Benghazi scandal!” Fitton said.

Fitton said, “We’ve known for some time the Clinton investigation was a sham and corrupt. The text messages are further proof. Clinton email investigation should be reopened. More than enough evidence, especially on classified info abuse, to arrest Mrs. Clinton now.”


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Canadian Friend
Guest
Canadian Friend
6 years ago

Correct me ( anyone ) if I’m wrong but Hillary had her staff destroy with hammers her cellphones and other devices AFTER the FBI handed her a subpoena.

destroying evidence after you get a sub paena is a punishable offence,

I’m no expert but here is what I found at Wikipedia,

… … …
-1- subpoena ad testificandum orders a person to testify before the ordering authority or face punishment. The subpoena can also request the testimony to be given by phone or in person.

-2- subpoena duces tecum orders a person or organization to bring physical evidence before the ordering authority or face punishment. This is often used for requests to mail copies of documents to the requesting party or directly to court.
… … ….

I’m almost certain she got type 2, yet she still destroyed evidence

that alone should have gotten Hillary to be in trouble with the FBI/ with the law

I know she did more so much more than that, but my point is that no matter how you slice it, Hillary has done enough that she should face punishment.