Fascist Restaurant Owner of RedHenLexington Kicks Press Secretary Out


Sarah Huckabee Sanders was kicked out of the Red Hen Restaurant in Lexington, Virginia by a hate-filled owner — a Fascist Democrat. This is an example of what life will be like under the angry, hate-filled hard-left. If you disagree and you will pay.

Someone has co-opted the restaurant’s website and sends anyone who clicks on it to an online Chinese motorcycle shop. But their Facebook pages are still up.

The restaurant owner took down their Twitter page and will soon be whining about how mean their victims are for not rejoicing over their Fascism. Apparently, Republicans aren’t allowed to eat out any longer.


People are taking exception to my definition of fascism aka liberal fascism. Yes, the left can be fascists — intolerant, authoritarian, oppressive and dictatorial. The left would have you believe only the right can be Nazis, authoritarians, and Fascists. Don’t believe it. It is true they are not nationalists, they are globalists, but they fit the rest of the definition.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders tweeted on Saturday that she was indeed asked to leave the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia, confirming a viral social media post written about the incident.

“Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for ⁦‪@POTUS‬⁩ and I politely left. Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so,” Mrs. Sanders said through her Twitter account Saturday.


This became known after a waiter posted information about it on Twitter, claiming the owner did it out of “moral conviction”. Fascism is now “moral conviction.” BANNING people with different opinions is A-OK with the hard-left Democrat Party. You will never hear a word of complaint from Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer or any of the other rats. This is very dangerous stuff.

Sarah Sanders’ father weighed in on the “bigotry” and “hate” this restaurant has on the menu.


The owner is Stephanie Wilkinson and she asked Mrs. Sanders to leave. There was no provocation other than the owner’s hate. An employee said: “My owner threw her out because she didn’t want the mouthpiece of Trump to eat in her restaurant.”

When Twitter users said that this would destroy the business, the employee responded: “My boss, the owner, kicked her out, not me. … Best publicity we could hope to have thank you very much.” Wilkinson was a participant in the hard-left Women’s March.



  1. Wow, the proprietors of this Marxist establishment really pissed off the masses. A google search of The Red Hen Lexington comes up with something under the restaurant name about “erectile dysfunction.” LMAO.

    Seriously though, aren’t these the same Commie bastards who sue bakeries because a Christian baker will not bake a cake for a gay wedding because of his faith?

    Answer: Hell yes and they’re the same people who cry for illegal alien children thrown in the trunk of a car with the blessings of their parents and hauled off to the United States but can’t be bothered to shed a tear or moment of concern for American children living and starving on the streets of their states.

    • Indeed, they are the same people. But that is the problem with collectivists of all stripes. They love government intervention into all aspects of what used to be considered personal responsibility. Many collectivist types today are that way due to college, media, peer or parental influences. They simply don’t know any better! Some are conscientious leaders of the authoritarian laden collectivist movement. The former have the potential of being informed and seeing the light. But the sold out leaders are not so reachable. The collectivist movement’s mission is to collect all the power it can into the hands of all governments at all levels and in all lands and put as much of it as possible into what they affectionately promote as “global governance”.
      As the world begins to awaken and understand where we are headed, we are seeing the beginning of pushback by the awakened and the collectivist establishment doesn’t like it one little bit!
      One of many videos on the subject of Individualism vs Collectivism: Enjoy!

  2. I don’t understand business owners who willfully destroy their own business which also hurts their employees, foolish.

  3. The sidewalk outside that eatery would be the PERFECT PLACE for freedom loving Americans to hold a big old demonstration. Let the bigoted owner know she can’t turn back the clock to the days of not serving people you simply don’t like. Wait. Virginia was a Confederate state wasn’t it? Some things die hard.

  4. Obviously this business owner has joined the ranks of a great many other business entity that depend on the general public for their daily bread and butter, and decided to enter politics. They need to stick to what they do best, which is serve their customers top quality, or at least mediocre food. When they enter the political arena, they will join a great many other business entities that made the same mistake, and have seen their businesses go down the hill, and in some cases, out the door. Stupid is as stupid does!

  5. If this had happened to Nancy Pelosi then you would be hearing about it. This is unbelievable. I hope all who support a one America will protest and not eat at that restaurant.

  6. I think it is inappropriate for the restaurant owner to be labelled a Fascist. The writer has no clue as to the meaning of the political system to which it refers.
    If a private sector business owner does not want you on his property, for whatever reason, he/she/they have their right to say “get off my property”. That’s not fascist! It may be a very, very stupid business decision but it is not fascist.
    While, as a patriotic American citizen and voter, I think the owner’s decision is reprehensible, intolerant and highly biased, this instance should be used by us and heralded by us as the precise example of a business owner’s right to exercise control over their establishment! She should NOT be forced to serve anyone that she doesn’t want to serve. It is not a government run restaurant!!! It is private! The Constitution has nothing to say about such decisions and we should NOT be asking government to pass unconstitutional laws that infringe on the rights of private sector property owners! It’s actually unAmerican to do so!
    I am fully in support of spreading the word about this establishment to all area and passing potential customers! Let’s see how long the owner can survive when the general public becomes aware of her decision.

    • If you don’t see the fascism with these Progressives, I don’t know how to respond to you. You’re talking philosophy when the reality is these leftists are silencing and dehumanizing the right and everyone with whom they disagree.

      I didn’t call for a boycott or say she violated the constitution. And I am not asking the government to do a thing.

      They keep calling us fascists, Hitler, we’re running concentration camps, racists, Islamophobes, xenophobes, nativists, and so on, but you are worried about me turning it on them.

      • An excellent reply S.Noble.
        The hypocrisy of these “fascists” is totally mind boggling and Americanist purports to be supportive in spreading the word of this establishment but does he/she/it support all the name calling which your President and supporters are labeled?

        • No I do not. As I stated, “I think the owner’s decision is reprehensible, intolerant and highly biased…”
          She suffers from a serious case of TDS and needs to get counselling before she ruins her business or has a stroke. Neither of which her critics would mourn, I presume.
          What your own bias is not allowing you to see is the right of a business owner to refuse service to a customer, on any grounds they wish. Remember the Christian run bakery that refused to make a cake for two homosexuals? Did they not have that right? According to the fascist government overlords, they didn’t. What that means is that you as a business owner do not have the freedom of choice that rightfully accompanies your legally owned property.
          I am more than happy to get into “the weeds” defending both business owners’ rights to run their businesses if you want. But I hope you see my point in defense of liberty and the accompanying results of their decisions.

      • Americanist and I might have different opinions, but we agree on the definition of fascist. It’s not just a blanket political insult that sounds super cool and important. It has a meaning, and the author sadly doesn’t understand it.

        • It’s amazing how people on the right are so freely called every name under the sun and no definition is ever needed.

          • I totally get where you’re coming from! Totally! It would infuriate me more if I didn’t already understand these useful idiots as they mindlessly serve the collectivist movement.
            You remember, “sticks and stones…”, right? Water off a duck’s back?
            Let them “sing” like canaries for their masters. They only put egg on their faces among the more sensible public at large. They lose while thinking they’re winning.
            More people are awakening every day to their total nonsense and thousands every day are taking the “red pill” and many for the first time are seeing all the rabbit holes they couldn’t see before.
            I am right there with you on everything but the use of the word Fascist in connection with her right to not serve Sarah, our nation’s Press Secretary and a fine one at that!

            • They fit every aspect of the definition except the nationalist part. I would have called her a Nazi but I try not to diminish the meaning of that.

      • First, we seem to be for liberty, aren’t we? If so, and since you seem to wish a deeper discussion of the issue, let’s define some terms that have largely escaped the general public due to these same “progressives” who have weaponized such labels as Fascists and racists.
        What is the definition and features of “Fascism”? How would you recognize it if you saw it?
        Let’s start there, why don’t we?

        • Leftists are totalitarians too. The fake liberal definitions are sickening. Hitler was a socialist by the way, not a right-winger.

          • If you think I am even a little bit on the left, you are, if I may joke a bit, “getting too much exercise jumping to conclusions”.
            I am a liberty loving constitutionalist that has spent more than forty-two years in defense of it.
            And BTW, you are spot on with what you said above about all of them being left-wing.

    • If the government makes an issue of this incident and fines or forces this restaurant to serve anyone who walks in their door, then she will be dealt a blow by the hands of a fascist government. Under fascism, as practiced in Italy under Mussolini, the state didn’t actually, legally, own your business. They just told you how you were going to run it! That’s the funny thing about this whole incident.
      The owner has a serious case of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). It seems obvious that she is a very radical socialist, Hillary/Bernie type supporter who just can’t help but go lower when her opponent goes higher.
      While you may be a kindred spirit with this hater, and I hope you’re not, you should be careful about what you ask for. A government powerful enough to tell you how to run your business is powerful enough to take all that you have.

  7. Words mean things. Fascism has an actual definition. Please look it up. You look foolish, particularly when you repeat it again and again. You might as well say they are golf balls or sandwich bread or Easter eggs.

    • The dictionary definition of fascism: dictatorial political system aiming at overthrow of communists, radicals etc. and strong rule by dictator. Change communists to the Trump Republicans and S.Noble is not far wrong in her title as ever since your President has been elected the progressive left has been doing its very hardest to overthrow the elected government. As a business women I totally agree as to whom I may serve or not serve but as I do not have Trump Derangement Syndrome or religious reasons for not making a gay wedding cake, it would probably be only for someone being rude to my staff or being violent or drunk.
      nalebank ,CLO, Susan M Conner, words do mean things but please remember that when Trump supporters are called racists, nazis etc and hopefully you will come to their defense too. And of subject but similar What about the vile stuff being touted about the younger Trumps? Do you defend that as well as your fascist defense?

          • Her actions, to me, actually represented a sort of escape from her own groupthink programming and assertion of her natural individualism, a reconnection to her right to exercise control over that which she has a right to exercise.
            Indeed, the funny thing will be that other hate-filled liberals will applaud her individualism without actually recognizing it as highly hypocritical of their esteemed set of “virtues”.
            They include: tolerance, inclusivity, diversity, love & unity, anti-prejudicial attitudes and even democratic principles. She shot “a bird” at all of those things with her actions. That is why I contend her actions were decidedly anti-fascist.
            She has stepped “out of line” as a Democrat’.

  8. Fascists or not it’s finally coming out about democrats and the mean hateful people they really are and who have no agenda except for tax and spend and open borders.

Leave a Reply