Fox Figured Out How to Alienate More Viewers – Threaten Tucker, Who Is at 91 Million Viewers

6
232

Fox News figured out a way to alienate even more viewers. Their lawyers contacted Tucker Carlson to tell him that he breached his contract by launching his show, Tucker on Twitter.

Fox took Tucker off the air, and now they plan to silence him completely. They’ve become like the Stalinistas they claim to oppose.

Tucker’s lawyers responded with the following statement: “Fox defends its very existence on freedom of speech grounds. Now they want to take Tucker Carlson’s right to speak freely away from him because he took to social media to share his thoughts on current events,” said Carlson’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, to Axios.

Fox News is clearly opposed to free speech.

Tucker on Twitter Has Hit 91.5 Million Views, and He’s Not Done.

Tucker Carlson’s show is at 91.5 million views and climbing. Clearly, Fox’s leadership is comprised of morons. They can’t get the message sent by the viewers to stop what they’re doing. The viewers’ response is organic. Fox should have cut and run. Instead, they think they can survive with ruthless tactics. Fox viewers watch Fox because they oppose the tactics Fox is now using.

 

 

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Prisoner
1 year ago

They will seek a restraining order to stop Tucker. If they get it then they have won. They can then stall as the case goes up to the highest court. The legal aspects of the upcoming case are less important than the judges selected to rule.

The vast majority of people still watching Faux are not going anywhere. If firing Tucker did not drive them away, why would suing him? And they will not be very aware of the lawsuit, since they have Faux on all day.

Last edited 1 year ago by The Prisoner
The Prisoner
1 year ago

I think there are strong reasons to question the ethics of both Faux and Tucker:

In February, 2021, just after the 2020 election coup was completed, which Faux News and Tucker both participated in, Tucker signed a new contract with Faux. This means that Tucker renewed his contract with a corporation that was part of the election steal operation. Tucker was rich at the time. The ethical thing to do for Tucker was to leave at that time instead of letting Faux control him for 4 more years. Tucker chose a big audience and contract over ethics. Tucker then spent over 2 years rebuilding the ratings of the discredited Faux. He built their ratings then was discarded.

John Vieira
1 year ago

Beautiful!!! The purveyors of the “ONE” narrative must be literally ‘laying eggs’…

Peter Prange
1 year ago

If the numbers are accurate, Fox will make millions for Tucker.
Historically oppression develops opposition and the greater the pressure the stronger the opposition.
I think the average American, who has a thing about underdogs is literally driving people to learn what Tucker has to say. It will be interesting to see what numbers Ep. 2 generates. If Tucker consistently generates numbers in the tens of millions (10+ or especially 20+) it will be a good sign.
It would help to know how the number 91 million was derived.

The Prisoner
1 year ago
Reply to  Peter Prange

That’s s lot of people. Twitter was used in 2020 to defeat Trump and abuse the public, it could be used in 2024 in an opposite way.

John Acord
1 year ago

I’m delighted. This is the best news I have seen since November 5, 2916! Please note that  Blackrock purchased 15.8% , and Vanguard 10% of Fox News stock a few days before Tucker was fired. It Was Fox’s reward for going woke along with endless ads from BigPharma. They Will now lose 75% of their viewers and go broke along with Blackrock and Vanguard who have been pushing the woke programs on the corporations they invest their managed money.  Hopefully, Larry Fink will be fired. Americans are finally waking up and voting with their pocketbooks and patronage.