MSM is thrilled to report the hearings will begin with a review of materials on Monday. It will be the start of another dog and pony show.
President Donald Trump has until December 6 to confirm whether his attorneys will cooperate with the impeachment hearings, according to the Judiciary Chair.
The plan is to call lawyers of the Democrats choosing to discuss possible constitutional grounds for impeachment. The Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, Jerrold Nadler plans to resuscitate collusion, although there was none.
The Judiciary is now taking over where the intel committee left off.
Meanwhile, The Hill is regaling Adam Schiff, the Intelligence Committee Chair, as the new “progressive rock star,” whose star has allegedly risen since the impeachment hearings. Schiff is described in the article as the natural heir to 86-year-old Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) or perhaps he will stay in the House and become Speaker.
The fact that he has lied through his teeth regularly is no problem for the left.
WHY SCHIFF HAS NOT RELEASED THE INSPECTOR GENERAL’S TESTIMONY
Schiff still hasn’t released the important testimony of the Intelligence Committee Inspector General Michael Atkinson. Atkinson is the person who claimed the complaint by whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was “credible” and “serious.”
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry asked on Twitter on Friday, “Why is Schiff still withholding transcript of ICIG Michael Atkinson’s Oct 4 closed-door testimony which lasted 8+ hours? He’s released 15 witness transcripts but is still hiding Atkinson’s. Also, what’s Atkinson’s connection to Obama officials including David Laufman?”
-
The Importance of Prayer: How a Christian Gold Company Stands Out by Defending Americans’ Retirement
DEVELOPING: Why is Schiff still withholding transcript of ICIG Michael Atkinson’s Oct 4 closed-door testimony which lasted 8+ hours? He’s released 15 witness transcripts but is still hiding Atkinson’s. Also, what’s Atkinson’s connection to Obama officials including David Laufman?
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 30, 2019
Paul Sperry is the reporter who revealed Eric Ciaramella is the ‘whistleblower’ in an exposé last month at real clear investigations.
Congressman Ratcliffe responded to Paul Sperry, “I know why Paul Sperry. It’s because I asked IG Atkinson about his “investigation” into the contacts between Schiff’s staff and the person who later became the whistleblower. The transcript is classified “secret” so Schiff can prevent you from seeing the answers to my questions.”
Whoa!
I know why @paulsperry_ It’s because I asked IG Atkinson about his “investigation” into the contacts between Schiff’s staff and the person who later became the whistleblower. The transcript is classified “secret” so Schiff can prevent you from seeing the answers to my questions
— John Ratcliffe (@RepRatcliffe) November 30, 2019
THEY HAVE CAUSE
According to Sperry, Congressional investigators now believe they have cause to subpoena the so-called whistleblower, who is actually a leaker and a gossip. They want to hear about his concealment of a material fact on his “intake form,” i.e., not disclosing “his contacts with Schiff’s staff as required.”
BREAKING: Congressional investigators believe they have cause to investigate and subpoena the “whistleblower” to testify concerning the fact he “concealed a material fact” on his sworn ICIG “intake form” by failing to disclose his contacts with Schiff’s staff as required (Part 4)
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 30, 2019
WHO IS THE WHISTLEBLOWER
The anti-Trump ‘whistleblower,’ 33-year-old Eric Ciaramella is a registered Democrat, who worked for then-president Barack Obama, then-vice president Joe Biden, and CIA Director John Brennan, and he’s a vocal critic of President Trump. He helped initiate the ‘Russia collusion’ probe and wrote the complaint initiating the Ukraine hoax investigation.
As Sperry and Ratcliffe noted, he met with Adam Schiff’s staff before filing the complaint, which is one of the many things rock star Schiff lied about.
Eric Ciaramella is a CIA officer who specializes in Russia and Ukraine and who worked in the National Security Council under Susan Rice in 2015.
He was then moved into the West Wing in 2017 to ‘fill a vacancy’ where he basically spied, though some will say he informed for his former bosses.
IG Atkinson said that he found the complaint credible and serious. I would like to know what his thoughts were in why this complaint was “serious” and how it was credible based on the phone call. What exactly was the complaint that he saw that was so compelling, for him to come to that conclusion? Based on the transcript of the phone call released by the president, would he still have reached the same conclusion? Just wondering? I doubt very seriously he would have had the same conclusion.
This whole impeachment farce has been an attempt to keep us from learning about Ukraine’s involvement in the 2016 elections and the money laundering of billions of dollars by the Obama Administration back to Democrats in key positions. Let’s not forget the children of those Democrats hired by the Government of Ukraine in cushy positions for an exorbitant amount of money.
….Eric better be literally watching his back. He should avoid flying, eating out…walking home at 0400 in Georgetown…or weight lifting without a spotter! Ha!
Eric CIA ramella, you are known by the company you keep. Scum
remember how obama treated whistleblowers? using wwI spying laws and prosecuting 5/6. almost double the prosecutions of all presidents combined
A conspiracy to commit treason. That is what this is. News Media, Democrats, homosexual movements, Muslims, are all involved in this conspiracy to overthrow the United States!