Hillary Clinton’s Romance with Jihad



For a long time, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has had an unabashed attraction to Muslims with controversial ties. Their allure is so strong she seems unable to control it, at times. For example, in 1999 Hillary – who pretends to be a supporter of Israel during election cycles – was on the West Bank, standing next to the charm-exuding Suha Arafat, who had just finished a speech accusing Israel of poisoning Palestinians, when Clinton apparently lost restraint of her emotions and planted a wet kiss on the cheek of the surprised Suha.

Though she knew then that she would run for political office, Clinton could not hold back from kissing the wife of Yassir Arafat, the arch-terrorist and murderer. Recall that, during Bill Clinton’s term, Arafat, who shouldn’t have even been allowed entrance to our country was the most frequent visitor to the White House.


Clinton surrounds herself with Muslim Brotherhood–linked individuals

You may remember that in 2012 Reps. Michele Bachmann, Louie Gohmert, Trent Franks, Tom Rooney and Lynn Westmoreland signed letters to various inspectors general asking for investigations into possible undue influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in their agencies.

The letter to the inspector general of the State Department alleged that Hillary Clinton’s aide, from whom she’s inseparable, Huma Abedin, had 3 close family members “connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.”

This brought a storm of criticism from Republicans, beginning with Sen. John McCain:

He praised Huma as “an intelligent, upstanding, hard-working and loyal servant of our country,… who has devoted countless days of her life to advancing the ideals of the nation she loves….”

There was much more. Such glowing praise hasn’t been heaped upon anyone since George Washington was alive. But it wasn’t long before Andrew C. McCarthy reported that the letter “actually understated the case.” [Emphasis added.]:

“The letter averred that Abedin ‘has three family members connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.’ It turns out, however, that Abedin herself is directly connected to Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure involved in the financing of al-Qaeda.

“Abedin worked for a number of years [12] at the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs as assistant editor of its journal. The IMMA was founded by Naseef, who remained active in it for decades, overlapping for several years with Abedin.

“Naseef was also secretary general of the Muslim World League in Saudi Arabia, perhaps the most significant Muslim Brotherhood organization in the world. In that connection, he founded the Rabita Trust, which is formally designated as a foreign terrorist organization under American law due to its support of al-Qa’eda.”

The MWL is “the Saudi-financed global propagation enterprise by which the Muslim Brotherhood’s virulently anti-Western brand of Islamist ideology is seeded throughout the world, very much including in the United States,” wrote McCarthy.

“The MWL manages the ‘civilization jihad’ –  the Brotherhood’s commitment to destroy the West from within, and to “conquer” it by sharia proselytism.”

One way the MB pursues that mission is by infiltrating our government.

You may wonder just how Huma Abedin, working for the secretary of state, was able to get a security clearance. Andrew McCarthy also wondered about that:

“A person is not required to have done anything wrong to be denied a high-ranking government position, or more immediately, the security clearance allowing access to classified information that is necessary to function in such a job. There simply need be associations, allegiances, or interests that establish a potential conflict of interest.

“Apparently, the Obama Admin. had relaxed those caveats, and Hillary Clinton didn’t care either.”

You likely do not know exactly what was in the letters sent by Rep. Bachmann and the other four patriots. Here are some of the points raised in the one sent to the inspector general overseeing the Department of State. They do not speak well for then-Secretary, Hillary Clinton:

Given that the U.S. government has established in federal court [in the Holy Land trial] that the Muslim Brotherhood’s mission in the United States is “destroying the Western civilization from within” – a practice the Muslim Brothers call “civilization jihad” – we believe that the apparent involvement of those with such ties raises serious security concerns…

The State Department and, in several cases, the specific direction of the Secretary of State, have taken actions recently that have been enormously favorable to the Muslim Brotherhood and its interests. These include:

  • A personal intervention by Secretary Clinton that allowed a prominent Muslim Brotherhood leader, Tariq Ramadan, to enter the United States – overturning a policy of a previous administration that precluded him from doing so. Mr. Ramadan has reportedly used the visits … to engage in what the Brotherhood calls “civilization jihad” in the United States: proselytization, recruitment, indoctrination, fundraising, and other forms of promotion of the totalitarian, supremacist Islamic doctrine known as shariah.
  • A succession of meetings with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – a multinational group that is, like the Muslim Brotherhood, determined to impose shariah worldwide. These are now known as “the Istanbul Process” and are aimed at finding ways to accommodate the OIC’s demands for restrictions on freedom of expression guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, so as to preclude “blasphemy” against Islam and its adherents. [Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton worked closely with the OIC to pass UN Resolution 16/18,” which calls on all nations to essentially criminalize criticism of Islam.]
  • Assorted efforts undertaken in the name of “engaging” the Muslim Brotherhood both in Egypt and the United States. Lately, these have amounted to de facto U.S. recognition of the Muslim Brotherhood, and also assisting the realization of the Brotherhood’s goals.
  • Secretary Clinton’s waiver of congressional restrictions on aid to Egypt, allowing $1.5 billion to be translated in a highly unusual lump-sum payment….
  • Secretary Clinton’s waiver of congressional restrictions on aid to the Palestinian Authority, which now has a so-called “unity government” that includes Hamas, a designated terrorist organization and the Palestinian franchise of the Muslim Brotherhood. This cleared the way for a transfer of $170 million in U.S. foreign aid to the terrorist organization, Hamas, and its partner, Fatah.

The letter also quotes the “‘Supreme Guide’ of the international Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammed Badie, in September 2010, openly called for jihad by all ‘the Arab and Muslim peoples’ against the United States.”


What Clinton really did in Libya and Egypt

I’ve written about the findings of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi, and America’s apparent switching of sides in the war on terror: “His title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels, which basically means Christopher Stevens was America’s very first envoy to al-Qa’eda, explained Clare Lopez.” And: “The U.S. was fully aware of and facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qa’eda-dominated rebel militias throughout the 2011 rebellion.” Since we had been attacked by al-Qa’eda on 9/11, some might call that treason.

You can read the full CCB report, here.

This has recently been corroborated here, by Andrew McCarthy, another expert on the Global Jihad Movement, and prosecutor of the Blind Sheik:

“Before becoming ambassador, Stevens was the Obama administration’s official liaison to Qaddafi’s Islamist opposition in Libya, including its al-Qaeda-linked groups.”

And here:

“Secretary Clinton led the policy shift in which our government changed sides in Libya –  shifting support to the Muslim Brotherhood and its allies, just as Mrs. Clinton had urged shifting U.S. support to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. In Libya, this included arming ‘rebels,’ who naturally included a heavy concentration of jihadists.”

Notice the new information revealing that Clinton actually pushed Obama to switch sides to Islamists and terrorists: “Secretary Clinton led the policy shift…” and: “Mrs. Clinton had urged shifting U.S. support to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.” [Italics mine.]


Clinton’s Real views on Israel and Jews

Conservative Review reports:

“As a college student, Hillary embraced the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and admired its leader Yassar Arafat, once defending him as a “‘freedom fighter’ trying to free his people from their Israeli ‘oppressors.’”

Christopher Anderson, in his book, American Evita, provided two vignettes that tell us just what kind of person Hillary Clinton is:

At a time when elements of the American Left embraced the Palestinian cause and condemned Israel, Hillary was telling friends that she was “sympathetic” to the terrorist organization and admired its flamboyant leader, Yasser Arafat. When Arafat made his famous appearance before the UN General Assembly in November 1974 wearing his revolutionary uniform and his holster on his hip, Bill “was outraged like everybody else,” said a Yale Law School classmate. But not Hillary, who tried to convince Bill that Arafat was a “freedom fighter” trying to free his people from their Israeli “oppressors.”

The second vignette demonstrates that Hillary Clinton not only agrees with the Palestinians; she’s anti-Semitic as well:

It was during [a] trip to his home state that Bill took Hillary to meet a politically well-connected friend. When they drove up to the house, Bill and Hillary noticed that a menorah – the seven branched Hebrew candelabrum (not to be confused with the more common and subtler mezuzah)-has been affixed to the front door.

“My daddy was half Jewish,” explained Bill’s friend. “One day when he came to visit, my daddy placed the menorah on my door because he wanted me to be proud that we were part Jewish. And I wasn’t about to say no to my daddy.”

To his astonishment, as soon as Hillary saw the menorah, she refused to get out of the car. “Bill walked up to me and said that she was hot and tired, but later he explained the real reason.” According to the friend and another eyewitness, Bill said, “I’m sorry, but Hillary’s really tight with the people in the PLO in New York. They’re friends of hers, and she just doesn’t feel right about the menorah.” —Source: American Thinker.


Leave a Reply