Hillary and Staff Might Lose Security Clearances — Might?

2
331

State Department officials have opened “a formal inquiry” into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server located in her New York residence, and are considering whether she and her aides should lose their security clearances, Fox News reports.

Why does she still have them after being “extremely careless”? Why does Soros’s colleague John Podesta have them?

It’s about the private server again

Officials are investigating her use of a private server in the basement of her Chappaqua, New York, mansion to determine if she mishandled classified information during her tenure as the nation’s top diplomat, Fox reported. This was confirmed by Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley.

The federal government operates slowly, partly because of the cumbersome bureaucracy made more burdensome by the Deep State dragging their heels.

Not only does Hillary have security clearances, but her staff does as well. They can’t be trusted either. Podesta is tied to George Soros as is Hillary.

Candidates and their campaigns lose their clearances after a year and that’s probably how long this investigation will drag on – easily.

It would be a good idea to take their security clearances away immediately, but they won’t. Why won’t they in an era of leaks?

An inquiry could drag on and on and on.

Fox News reports that the “investigation aims to determine whether Clinton and her closest aides violated government protocols by using her private server to receive, hold and transmit classified and top-secret government documents.”

This should take no more than a few hours, but the State spokesperson wouldn’t say how long it would take.

All while the investigation goes on, these anti-Trump hooligans will have access to Top Secret information – daily. Hillary and her comrades don’t work in government and don’t need the information.

Then there is this other investigation

Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley launched an investigation into Clinton’s handling of emails in March. There is so much available information on this. It’s obvious she broke the law. Use the data already collected. Why waste taxpayer money and begin all over again?

We know Clinton was “extremely careless” which is clearly negligence with highly classified intelligence.

Grassley contended there is “evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information…”

Refer her to AG Sessions already, Tillerson, Grassley.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments