House Dems Are ENRAGED After Hope Hicks’ Testimony

16

CNN hoped for a blockbuster story today after Hope Hicks testified behind closed doors. They said she no longer returns some of the President’s calls, which is probably a total and complete lie. They are now very angry that nothing came of her testimony and they’re calling her the “Forrest Gump of the Trump White House.”

The President exercised executive privilege over her testimony, which is his right to do.

Democrats are reportedly ENRAGED. ENRAGED, I TELL YOU. They think they are the only ones in D.C. with power. Well, surprise!

Some Dems now want to start impeachment proceedings for obstruction.

CNN correspondent Manu Raju reported earlier [her testimony is over] that Dems not happy so far with Hope Hicks appearance. Karen Bass told me “it’s pretty ridiculous” WH counsels are objecting to any questions about her time at the WH, as Nadler goes one-by-one through the questions. Nadler made clear to Hicks and the WH that he views this as “absurd”

Ted Lieu, the hard-left ranter of the House, is furious but seems to forget that is what every one of Hillary’s people did with no objections from Democrats at that time.

We are watching the goose-gander rights in action.

According to Democrat Rep. Ted Lieu (CA), Hope Hicks even refused to answer where her office was located in the White House. 😂😂😂😂😂

Democrats are trying to say the President is hiding something. He gave an unprecedented amount of information to Mueller and he has the right to assert executive privilege. When Hillary’s staff refused to answer any questions, there wasn’t a peep out of these Democrats and she wasn’t the President.

Trump Made Some Legitimate Comments on Twitter and the Media Is Reporting He’s LASHING OUT [The Hill]!

This is ridiculous. There is nothing crazy about what he is saying here.

  • Ted “Loo” and Nancy Nadler, and the rest of you COMMUNIST MFs are going into the special septic tank for what you are doing to this country, one way or the other, you will be going down by RAIL or by JAIL..
    IT DOES NOT MEAN ANYTHING TO US THAT YOU MOBILIZE YOUR ANTIF, BLM, OR ANY OTHER TERRORIST GROUPS, BEFORE WE DISPOSE OF THEM WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT ANY CONFRONTATION THEY START WILL NOT LEAVE YOU OR YOUR FAMILY STANDING, AS YOU WILL BE DEPORTED TO COMMUNIST CHINA OR COMMUNIST RUSSIA, WHERE YOU BELONG.
    By the way, GET SOME QUALIFIED LAWYERS, BECAUSE THE ONES YOU HAVE NOW SUCK AND DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE LAW OR THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

  • OK dumborats, lets see if I got this straight, they exonerate Hillary because they think she didn’t intend to do what she did do. then Mulehead can’t find that Trump did anything, but they think Trump intended to do what he didn’t do, so we need to impeach him !!!!!!

  • llegal alien invaders detained at boarder: They came here on their own, no one rounded them up and brought them here. They get comfortable quarters, plenty of free food, free health care, free to leave at any time. No one forcing them to work or stay here.
    Nazi concentration camp: Millions of Jews rounded up by force, shoved into cattle train cars to ride for days with no food no bathroom facilities then quartered in rat and disease infested barracks with no heat during winter. More than one to sleep on bed with no mattress. Maybe one rotten potato or a little stale bread and water a day for food. Many died of malnutrition, dysentery, other diseases or forced to work until dead or sent to gas chambers.
    The idiots like Cortez and other sleazy democRATs and crybaby liberals try to compare the treatment of illegal alien invaders at our boarder to the treatment of people in Nazi concentration camps is they height of hypocrisy and stupidity.

  • My theory is that the Democrats are trying to throw the 2020 election to Trump with this kind of constant, infantile crap!. Reason unknown.

  • The Dim’s are appearing to be the biggest jackaxes in the history of political bantering. Trump is the fox in the henhouse and the Dim’s are the fodder for the trolls. What a bunch of ‘tards!

  • They don’t need fed by the citizens of the U.S. Let the others of their race who are here legally feed, house, clothe, educate and doctor them. See how long that lasts. The taxpaying citizens are being used by the, you guessed in, stinking democrats.

  • it can only be “obstruction of justice” if a crime has been committed. inventing a crime with no evidence and no relevance to the due process of law, cannot be “obstruction”. the only charge that could be brought here is the one of “frivolous mischeief” being brought by the howler monkeys of the house and senate. a cure might be for all of them to “get a dog”, but that would be cruel and unusual punishment to the dog.

    • And the President cannot be convicted of a crime is the President is merely exercising executive authorities granted to him in the Constitution. The Congress does not have the power to pass laws contravening the Constitution or limiting Constitutional powers. If they want to change the Constitution they have to amend it by the processes laid out in the Constitution. Trump is head of the Executive Branch and can fire any executive branch employee for any reason he wants. As head of the executive branch Trump is the head of the DOJ and every other executive department and is free to tell them to do what he wants them to do. If they disagree they are free to resign.

  • GOOD! Beyond time to stop cooperating with Dems. They had more shots at Trump than is reasonable. Their own investigation proved him innocent. GO AWAY LOSERS! LOL! MAGA!

  • The law is long settled on this. Presidents could not get an unbiased full range of advice if every word every colleague and advisor was taped and public or the equivalent if all of it could be forced out in testimony under oath. Hence the Supreme Court has upheld the right of executive privilege as a necessary concomitant for the Executive to function.

    I wonder if the Congress would be ok to have every conversation they have with one another or their advisors made public.

    The law is crystal clear that they cannot force Hicks or any other direct Presidential advisor or colleague to testify to conversations with the President under oath or not under oath.