Instead of doing something about the crime wave, like getting rid of the bail reform laws or surveilling some of these radical communist and fascist groups, the New York government under Governor Kathy Hochul plans to surveil people who aren’t going along with the narrative. Her administration is collecting data on you.
“Also, we’re very focused on the data collecting from surveillance efforts, what’s being said on social media platforms, and we have launched an effort to be able to counter some of the negativity and reach out to people when we see hate speech being spoken about on online platforms.
“Our social media analysis unit has ramped up. It’s monitoring of sites to catch incitement to violence and direct threats to others, and all this is in response to our desire, our strong commitment to ensure that not only do New Yorkers be safe, but they also feel safe…
[Bring back Stop and Frisk and keep gun criminals in prison.]
“As I said, no one walking down the street or in the subway should feel they have to fight or hide indications of what their religious beliefs are. We expect to see people celebrating their lives and walking out freely, and that is no longer the case because people are living in fear. They have a right to do whatever they want here in the state of New York.”
Her solution won’t do a thing for Jewish people
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
Hey hochul F CK YOU! Is that hateful enough you stupid communist b itch? I think you are a piece of s hit!
Everything her and her gang are calling and accusing Trump of being (Hitler) is exactly who they are and what they are doing. They are getting bolder by the day because they know nobody will touch them.
Should those of us who are commenting here be concerned? Maybe they could learn something by reading the information this blogger presents tirelessly, day in and day out.
Oh my gawd, you can bet she’ll be targeting conservatives. Faget about it if you’re a card carrying blm or antifa member, you’ll have nothing to worry about it.
I miss the old days when politicians were too busy lining their pockets with money and other benefits. Now they inject themselves into peoples lives trying to tell them how to live. I was going to say, do these New Yorkers miss Cuomo yet but then I remembered he was responsible for sending old people to their deaths in nursing homes during Covid, for which he has never been held responsible.
Robert A. Heinlein once wrote that we should always prefer a “business politician” to a “cause politician.” The business politician can be kept in line by the electorate; the cause politician listens to nothing but his own convictions and conscience. The latter will defy the electorate rather than go against his convictions. In extreme cases, it will take the high-speed administration of lead to remove him.
I agree,
Ah, here it is, from Time Enough For Love:
“Reform politicians not only tend to be dishonest but stupidly dishonest-whereas the business politician is honest.”
“I don’t see that Lazarus. History seems to show-“.
“Use your head, Ira. I don’t mean that a business politician won’t steal; stealing is his business. But all politicians are nonproductive. The only commodity any politician has to offer is jawbone. His personal integrity-meaning, if he gives his word, can you rely on it? A successful business politician knows this and guards his reputation for sticking by his commitments-because he wants to stay in business-go on stealing, that is-not only this week but next year and years after that. So if he’s smart enough to be successful at this very exacting trade, he can have the morals of a snapping turtle, but he performs in such a way as not to jeopardize the only thing he has to sell, his reputation for keeping promises.
“But a reform politician has no such lodestone. His devotion is to the welfare of all the people-an abstraction of very high order and therefore capable of endless definitions. If indeed it can be defined in meaningful terms. In consequence your utterly sincere and incorruptible reform politician is capable of breaking his word three times before breakfast- not from personal dishonesty, as he sincerely regrets the necessity and will tell you so-but from unswerving devotion to his ideal.
“All it takes to get him to break his word is for someone to get his ear and convince him that it is necessary for the greater good of all the peepul. He’ll geek.
“After he gets hardened to this, he’s capable of cheating at solitaire. Fortunately he rarely stays in office long-except during the decay and fall of a culture.”
Too few people have heeded Heinlein’s wisdom.