Insurrection by the Party of Democracy
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D., Md.), the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, challenged Trump’s victory in 2016. He told Axios that Democrats would certify the results but only if the election was “free, fair, and honest.” However, Raskin said he “definitely” doesn’t assume that Trump would use free, fair, and honest means to secure a victory.
Trump “is doing whatever he can to try to interfere with the process, whether we’re talking about manipulating electoral college counts in Nebraska or manipulating the vote count in Georgia or imposing other kinds of impediments,” Raskin said.
Mr. Trump wanted Nebraska to become a winner-takes-all state in the Electoral College. It only involves one electoral vote, but it could be important. Nebraska rejected the idea. Lindsey Graham was pushing for it. Where I am in New York, they did that, and now Long Island and Upstate have no vote in the presidential election unless they are voting Democrat. It’s rich to hear Raskin criticize anyone for making the election unsecured. Raskin has said if Trump wins, they are going to look to have him arrested for insurrection or something.
Trump wanted the election to be secure in Georgia. After the last election, he wanted the Secretary of State to look again at the ballots to be certain there weren’t 11,000 more votes. Democrats made that into a crime. Meanwhile, Stacey Abrams, who lost bigly to Gov. Kemp, never conceded the election. She also sued him and still says she is the governor.
Rep. Jim McGovern (D., Mass.), the ranking Democrat on the House Rules Committee, also raised objections following the 2016 election. He said Democrats would certify a Trump win “assuming everything goes the way we expect it to. … We have to see how it all happens.”
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D., Ill.), a senior Democrat who challenged the results of George W. Bush’s reelection victory in 2004, said she is worried about the “shenanigans [Trump] is planning” and wants to “make sure that all the rules have been followed” before committing to certify the results.
Democrats refuse to commit to certifying the election results if their candidate doesn’t win. They are messaging their army of communists and lunatics.
When Trump won in 2016, Democrats said he was not the president and they wouldn’t recognize him. They then sued him or had their allies sue him relentlessly.
Axios said most Democrats supported certifying the election if Donald Trump wins.
You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:
For those of you that aren’t up to speed, I’ll give you a nickles worth of free advice.
‘Politicians’ are a direct result of the choice made by ‘voters’.
The main problem with most politicians, particularly Liberals and RINO’s, is that they will say and do anything to get elected and then only say and do whatever they have to to get re-elected. In between those points they play power games to suit themselves and deceive the ‘voters’. Those that are not all out for themselves are few and far between..
Raskin and other democrats like him must have some snake DNA in them
What they do such as rigging elections, which is pure evil, they accuse others of doing.
Disgusting people they are, revolting.
Demon possessed
Trump needs to empty the jail cells where the J6er’s are and put these pukes in those cells.
REMOVE JAMIE RASKIN FROM OFFICE NOW!
52 USC 10307: Prohibited acts; From Title 52-VOTING AND ELECTIONS Subtitle I-Voting Rights CHAPTER 103-ENFORCEMENT OF VOTING RIGHTS
§10307. Prohibited acts
(a) Failure or refusal to permit casting or tabulation of vote
No person acting under color of law shall fail or refuse to permit any person to vote who is entitled to vote under any provision of chapters 103 to 107 of this title or is otherwise qualified to vote, or willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report such person’s vote
(b) Intimidation, threats or coercion
No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for urging or aiding any person to vote or attempt to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for exercising any powers or duties under section 10302(a), 10305, 10306, or 10308(e) of this title or section 1973d or 1973g of title 42.
If Jamie Raksin or any other member of Congress fails to honor, or tries to intimidate voters by threatening not to honor, the legitimate vote of the people, that person shall be in violation of federal law, therefore , subject to removal from office and prosecution.
Hopefully there will be a lot of vacated jail cells that were inhabited by the J6’ers. Trump can imprison these pukes there. But then again, it’s Trump we’re talking here, so don’t hold your breath.