Jeff Sessions/DoJ Accused of Massive Cover Up in Imran Awan ‘Spy’ Case

13

According to Fox News, Imran Awan, the former IT aide to congressional Democrats pleaded guilty Tuesday to federal bank fraud in a plea deal where prosecutors said they “uncovered no evidence” that Awan “violated federal law with respect to the House computer systems.”

The Imran Awan ‘spy’ scandal, now a simple bank fraud case, was originally unraveled by Luke Rosiak at The Daily Caller.

The Pakistani IT tech and his family, who worked for House Democrats, are alleged to have stolen confidential data off the Democrat House computers and transferred it to an outside server. Awan allegedly destroyed hard drives and tried to flee the county. He was nabbed at the airport.

The FBI has a different story.

Fox News reports:

“Particularly, the government has found no evidence that your client illegally removed House data from the House network or from House members’ offices, stole the House Democratic Caucus server, stole or destroyed House information technology equipment, or improperly accessed or transferred government information, including classified or sensitive information,” the prosecution said in the plea deal.

Prosecutors said the government conducted a “thorough investigation of those allegations.”

The government interviewed 40 witnesses, took custody of the House Democratic Caucus server and other devices, reviewed electronic communications between House employees and questioned Awan during multiple voluntary interviews, the plea deal said…

…Awan’s attorney, Christopher J. Gowen, said in court Tuesday they are seeking a probation-only sentence without a fine or restitution. A sentencing hearing is set for Aug. 21.

LUKE ROSIAK RESPONDED

WITNESSES TOLD TO NOT BRING THE FBI EVIDENCE

In early June, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) alleged on the House floor that the FBI has actually instructed witnesses to not bring documentary evidence to them about the Awan brothers’ case so they can say there’s no evidence for them to investigate.

President Trump weighed in last month and tweeted that the DoJ must not let Awan and Debbie Wasserman Schultz off the hook. He said, “They want to make a “plea deal” to hide what is on their Server. Where is Server? Really bad!”

THE SECOND HACK OF THE DNC

A second hack at the DNC took place two weeks after President Trump’s inauguration and the Awans could be suspects.

“There was a second hack that occurred the same week that the DNC was breached, the same week that WikiLeaks started putting up those DNC emails,” Rosiak said in an appearance on Lou Dobbs’ Fox Business Network show last month.

People who have looked at the evidence uncovered by Luke Rosiak say the IT guys and the Awan family and are being protected for political reasons. Our DoJ is still politicized and they could be covering this up.

THE PLEA DEAL COVER UP

The DoJ plea deal with Awan and his wife means no one will ever know what happened. Rosiak strongly believes the Awans are tied to the DNC hacks/leaks.

“What it is, is that the handling of this case disproves the entire Russia narrative,” Rosiak said. “They don’t care about hacking, they don’t care about foreign meddling. What they did, in this case, is knowingly allow the United States government to be hacked by Pakistanis for six months until right after the election so that they could peddle a phony narrative.”

Rosiak was even willing to go far enough to say that “what the Democrats did here is treason. They allowed the United States to continuously be hacked by the bad guys so that they could spin this Russia narrative.”

Who knows if it rises to the level of treason but we will never know thanks to the plea deal.

ROSIAK SAYS SESSIONS IS COVERING IT UP

“The DOJ, under Jeff Sessions, is covering up a scandal that exposes the entire Russia narrative as a hoax,” he told Dobbs. “It is within Jeff Sessions’ power to demolish this Russia narrative once and for all, charge the Pakistanis with hacking Congress, and expose the Democrats’ hypocrisy and negligence… This case is open and shut, and Jeff Sessions is refusing to bring the charges.”

The media refuses to cover the case.

WATCH:

PowerInbox

13 COMMENTS

  1. The DoJ has lost all credibility. Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller. I believe that it was Sessions who recommended Rosenstein. Yep, the swamp runs very deep.

  2. All of this is pure speculation about Awan skating but the reality looks something like this as learned by our military intelligence team working directly with the president in the white house – the Q team:
    As you can see from the president’s tweet – the Awan espionage together with 40 democratic staffers as well as involvement of the Clintons, Rosenstein, Mueller, Hussein, Lynch, Holder and more is currently kept under wraps but not ignored.
    Surely – this case is not to be adjudicated in this civilian court with a Obama appointed judge. No – this is a case of treason that will be heard and adjudicated in a military tribunal.
    While all those involved in that espionage/treason thought to be safe and Awan thought he was able to fool investigators by giving them a copy cat of a server that was manipulated and only contained a fraction of the original server they are dead wrong.

    As the CA AG Berrera – running and hiding out in CA after his involvement passing off a fake server to investigators – this server will bring down the house.

    Our military/NSA intelligence team HAS THE SERVER and they all know it!

    Our military intelligence team together with investigators unbeknownst to the Awans and DWS, Berrera and all others switched out the server in question with a copy/fake one. They thought by ‘stealing’ this server they are safe.

    So they thought – president Trump together with the NSA/MI have that server! It’s over for them!
    I leave it here ergo their reaction – riots and violence across the country is by design and engineered by the usual deep state.

    Keep faith and Trust the Plan! 🙂

  3. Some people will believe anything, namely “Q”. It’s pure wishful thinking for one to believe “military tribunals” will be used. There are “legal” requirements to meet a charge of treason, as outlined in the Constitution, and the use of the word has been misused by many. The stringent requirements of such a charge removes the possibility of political motivations.

    Instead of “Trust the Plan”, do a little more research. This is NOT 4-D chess. It’s about as ridiculous as the wild interpretations of the E.O. on human trafficking.

    • Hopefully you take your own advice and research especially the human trafficking/child trafficking via Mexican border. Come back and lecture me again!

      • Maybe you should read more “carefully”, as in “wild interpretations” of that Executive Order. Assumptions do not warrant conclusions.

  4. Maybe instead of doing away with ICE, we should do away with the DOJ and the FBI upper echelon and start over.

Leave a Reply