Judge Issues a “Very Limited” Block on USAID Dismantling

5
172

A federal judge issued “a very limited” temporary block on the Trump administration’s plan to place more than 2,000 United States Agency for International Development employees on leave at midnight. About 500 have already been put on leave.

Two foreign service unions sued the federal government as the administration attempted to reduce USAID’s workforce to 611 to slash government spending.

“This is about how employees are harmed in their capacity as employees, in the employee/employer relationship, and it seems to me that, for reasons I will discuss in this order, that I will enter there, the plaintiffs have established at least that there is irreparable harm as it relates to that relationship,” Judge Nichols said.

Acting assistant attorney Brett Shumate told the judge the layoffs were necessary because “the president has decided there was corruption and fraud at USAID.”

“He doesn’t have to justify to the plaintiffs and the court how he exercises his foreign affairs,” Shumate argued. “The president has determined, in his view, significant serious action needs to be taken tonight to prevent taxpayer funds from being sent outside the United States, used for purposes that he doesn’t think are appropriate.”

According to Reuters, Brett Shumate, a Justice Department official, told the judge more than 2,000 USAID employees would be put on paid leave, and that the president “decided there is corruption and fraud” at the agency.

The Unions Case

The American Foreign Service Organization and the American Federation of Government Employees filed the lawsuit in D.C. federal court Thursday, alleging that Trump engaged in a series of “unconstitutional and illegal actions” to destroy USAID systematically.

The unions told the judge it is causing a humanitarian crisis globally and creating a national security crisis.

The unions claimed that Congress alone could dismantle the agency, which is likely not the case since USAID had been established by executive order, not statute.

The plaintiffs have asked the court to declare Trump’s actions unlawful and issue an order requiring the Trump administration to “cease actions to shut down USAID’s operations in a manner not authorized by Congress.”

It is not immediately clear if the reductions would be permanent or temporary, potentially allowing more workers to return after what the Trump administration says will be a review of which aid and development programs it wants to resume. They have already increased the number from 294 to 611. They plan to keep the humanitarian end of the pseudo-agency.

The surviving programs will likely fall under Secretary Rubio.

The Unions receive a lot of money from USAID.

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter B. Prange,
3 months ago

It is amazing that so many people worked for USAID knowing they were immorally deceiving the American people, and no one blew the whistle.
Give them the Trump buyout option and be rid of them. They would have six months to go find honest work and should consider themselves fortunate. In my humble opinion what they really deserve is incarceration.

Lady Veteran
3 months ago

They need to be prevented from re-entering the government through back door employment. It’s the same side of the coin to allow former USAID employees to work for the NGO’s they once funded. It’s also unholy to have these people hired as government contractor’s too. However, my preference is to see all of them incarcerated, as well. What they’ve done makes Bernie Madoff look like a Saint.

Canadian Friend
3 months ago

I am no expert on the topic, but as far as I know, since USAID was created by executive order, it can be ended by executive order.

Peter B. Prange,
3 months ago

Remember, Friend, common sense rarely works when evil people are caught with their fingers in the cookie jar.

Canadian Friend
3 months ago

True