Justice Jackson “Doesn’t Understand” What SCOTUS Opinions Are For

9
680

Ketanji Jackson just doesn’t understand. She’s struggling to understand,.

And she can’t understand the purposes of Supreme Court Opinions  are not to give her an opportunity to tell Americans how she “FEELS”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is unaware of what her role is as a Supreme Court Justice. It’s unbelievable really. ABC News’s Linsey Davis interviewed Ketanji. During the wide-ranging interview, Davis asked if she was concerned about “the current state of American democracy.”

Jackson said she was “heartened” that people are focusing on the work of the Court. She should have stopped there. But, no she went on to say that through the SCOTUS process she is able to tell the American people how she “feels” about a case and the outcome.

“I think the nice part about being on the court is you have the opportunity, whether you’re in the majority or in the dissent, to express your opinions,” Jackson said. “I just feel that I have a wonderful opportunity to tell people, in my opinions, how I feel about the issues. And that’s what I try to do.”

The ABC anchor asked again if the Justice “is concerned about the state of democracy today.”

“My feelings about the state of democracy have been expressed in the context of my opinions when issues come up related to democracy,” Jackson replied. “So, it’s hard to say, you know, am I concerned in a general way? The concerns that I have articulated in my opinions.”

WOW!

No one cares about her feelings. We want justices to decide the law based on the Constitution.

Ketanji has learned nothing after being scolded by Justice Barrett and tutored by Justice Sotomayor.

Do you think she found out what a woman is yet?

Ketanji doesn’t understand at all.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
3 hours ago

How did she become a ‘judge’, and appointed to the Supreme Court ‘too boot’??? Talk about the ‘lowering of the Bar’….

Saltherring
2 hours ago
Reply to  Anonymous

The “Bar’ would have to be literally on the ground for her to even be on the list to be considered for any legitimate law school.

Ramet in Dallas
10 hours ago

I’m not a lawyer but ‘Justice’ is supposed to be blind which means personal feeling should not color judgement. Does she believe SCOTUS is a Star Chamber where they can decide law in a vacuum? Hopefully one of the Associate Justices will eventually get a bellyfull and tell her how the cow ate the cabbage thought it should be the… Read more »

Adonymost
10 hours ago

She likes to give her opinion, except when it comes to explaining what a woman is.

Popeye
10 hours ago

It never ends. Another unqualified placed into a position she has no place being all because of skin color.

The Prisoner
11 hours ago

Affirmative Action is lawfare which used the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (EEOC) to conduct legal terrorism across society. There is nothing in the Act to warrant it. But of course, the corrupt legal system used it to achieve leftist goals. So, we had a law which mandates equal treatment used to cause mass discrimination against white males. Judge Jackson… Read more »

Mark
16 hours ago

Libs don’t think, they emote.

Peter B. Prange,
17 hours ago

A woman is what you “feel” it should be! – K Jackson?
Would that be a perfect example of Subjective reality? Could the USA survive as supreme court of a majority of such people?

Last edited 17 hours ago by Peter B. Prange,