Justice Roberts: Rule of Law “Endangered,” Stop “Trashing the Justices”

26
622

Chief Justice John Roberts spoke with law students in Washington on Monday and described the rule of law as “endangered” and warned against “trashing the justices.” He didn’t name names.

What if some deserve trashing? He doesn’t include that when he speaks.

How about this clip with Chuckie:

“The notion that the rule of law governs is the basic proposition,” Roberts said during an appearance at Georgetown Law. “Certainly as a matter of theory, but also as a matter of practice, we need to stop and reflect every now and then how rare that is, certainly rare throughout history, and rare in the world today.”

We can all agree with Roberts when he blames the schools for not teaching civics and government structure. However, judges shouldn’t be running the country.

“That’s really too bad,” the chief justice told graduating students at the law school. “We’re developing a situation where a whole group of young people is growing up having no real sense about how our system of justice works.”

Roberts suggested some recent verbal attacks on the justices had gone too far. “The court has obviously made mistakes throughout its history, and those should be criticized, so long as it is in terms of the decision, really, and not ad hominem against the justices. I just think that doesn’t do any good,” the chief justice said.

In March, Roberts responded quickly when Trump called U.S. District Judge James Boasberg “crooked,” coming down on the idea of impeachment not being the answer. Actually, he’s right, but for a different reason than he gave. It’s pointless as it would never go anywhere.

As an aside, Roberts is a friend of Boasberg’s. By association, that’s concerning. He has other sketchy friends like Norm Eisen, who is behind many of these lawsuits against Trump, and was, ironically, heavily involved in impeachment efforts against Donald Trump.

“Impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts, an appointee of George W. Bush, said at the time.

In a speech earlier this month, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Biden appointee  who doesn’t know what a woman is, condemned “threats and harassment. She said they amounted to “attacks on our democracy [that] ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.”

Roberts’ public tone since Jackson’s remarks has been notably less dire. At a judicial event in Buffalo last week, he repeated his earlier written statement opposing impeachment of judges over decisions, but didn’t elaborate.

Sotomayor recently outright weaponized the Supreme Court, telling law firms to fight the Trump lawsuits without mentioning his name.

Roberts assured the students on Monday that the members of the Court all get along. That’s nice.

“We have to work together on these things that are difficult. You find a way to get along,” Roberts said. “It’s a long job. If you’re sort of really at each other’s throats with bad feelings and stuff like that, it just — it’s not a good way to function. … We do have to address some very, very difficult things, and we’re the only people who are doing it.”

Roberts, 70, isn’t retiring anytime soon. He said he has a “good, balanced way of looking at things.”  [Like Obamacare? It’s a tax, but not a tax?]

You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SimpleFacts
23 days ago

Dear Justice Roberts; Here’s the thing; there are 3 co-equal branches of government in this country all created by the Constitution. The executive, the legislative, and the judicial. That is the President, the Congress, and the SCOTUS. District judges are NOT a part of that equation. They are creatures of Congress and can be created or abolished at will.
Suck it up, Buttercup

don baker
24 days ago

Rule of law is threatened by judicial misconduct, legislating from the bench and following their own far left agenda rather than the law. Congress does have the authority to curtail what the court can take up to rule on. They should exercise that right

Impeach the Radical Judges
24 days ago

According to Roberts, everyone is subject to criticism except Supreme Court Justices; that is, these jurists should be allowed to make any harebrained decision they want and be free of criticisms. Regal Roberts should required to re-read the Constitution.

Mark
25 days ago

Just shut the hell up and do YOUR job, not the Presidents!

Dur Poiguy
25 days ago

If SCOTUS wants respect start following the US Constitution and stop issuing all these bogus partisan rulings. The average American citizen is showing better judgement than some Justices. If you are compromised-resign!